Startup Donna Aims to Reduce Work by Scanning for References, Terms Mistakes
Donna quickly scans a document and detects terms, logic and reference misuses to free up lawyers from spending too much time proofreading documents.
October 11, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Proofreading contracts and agreements is an integral part of any legal professional's life. Accordingly, software companies have created and marketed artificial intelligence-powered proofreading software for law firms and legal departments. Before Microsystems' merger with Litera and The Sackett Group, for instance, it had previously released proofreading software Contract Companion and EagleEye.
Donna is the latest entrant in the proofreading software market. According to its co-founder and CEO Rik Nauta, Donna looks to cut down on the “mundane work” of proofreading contracts and agreements. But Donna doesn't provide corrections for the documents it processes. Instead, it offers alerts for possible inaccuracies or misuse of terms and references.
What it is: Nauta said he sees Donna as a program that allows lawyers to be more creative and “focus on the parts of the work they like.”
“Finding a simple mistake in a contract is something all lawyers have to deal with, but we'll put it with a Donna twist with making it approachable, cost-focused,” Nauta said.
Donna, according to its website, costs upward of $99 per month for all features, excluding its advanced billing and role-based access control features. Access to all of Donna's features is priced for an unlisted “tailored” amount.
How It Works: To start the process, the Donna software reads the document. It labels any relevant information, such as clauses or information regarding party and jurisdiction. Next, the software attempts to understand the structure of the document and find any illogical or inaccurate usage of terms or references.
Nauta gave an example of how Donna can point out a single use of a term in the event the lawyer didn't use it correctly, explaining, “We can say, 'Hey, you've defined this term but never used it before.'” That notice provides a heads-up for lawyers to check if that term was used correctly.
The program's features include checking that every reference has a cross-reference and if the correct clause is referenced. Donna also scans for inaccurate literal and “convenience value” amounts of money, according to the software's website.
Along with its reference-checking feature, Donna analyzes the dictionary definition of words to ensure they are used correctly, Nauta explained.
Privacy Concerns: In the course of daily use, attorneys may want to take care with the system. While confidential information lawyers process through Donna is translated into numbers that the software then reads, users are still accountable for information left in its template, Nauta warned.
“With GDPR [General Data Protection Regulation], there may be PII [personally identifiable information] that is stored, the first responsibility is on the firm's end that the data isn't left there in the template,” he said.
Why It's Necessary: Nauta foresees lawyers in the coming years taking a more bring-your-own-device stance in the office when using software. Lawyers will buy software based on their individual needs and workflows and will not rely entirely on what their law firm provides, Nauta said.
Nauta, a nonlawyer, said his startup doesn't have legal expertise, but he thinks Donna can easily adapt to these workflows and devices.
“We really see Donna as the first step,” Nauta said. “We see an opportunity in the legal sphere, things we'll get different and automated. We see a lot of similarities with the internet of 10, 15 years ago.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 2'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 3The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 4Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 5In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250