Startup Donna Aims to Reduce Work by Scanning for References, Terms Mistakes
Donna quickly scans a document and detects terms, logic and reference misuses to free up lawyers from spending too much time proofreading documents.
October 11, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Proofreading contracts and agreements is an integral part of any legal professional's life. Accordingly, software companies have created and marketed artificial intelligence-powered proofreading software for law firms and legal departments. Before Microsystems' merger with Litera and The Sackett Group, for instance, it had previously released proofreading software Contract Companion and EagleEye.
Donna is the latest entrant in the proofreading software market. According to its co-founder and CEO Rik Nauta, Donna looks to cut down on the “mundane work” of proofreading contracts and agreements. But Donna doesn't provide corrections for the documents it processes. Instead, it offers alerts for possible inaccuracies or misuse of terms and references.
What it is: Nauta said he sees Donna as a program that allows lawyers to be more creative and “focus on the parts of the work they like.”
“Finding a simple mistake in a contract is something all lawyers have to deal with, but we'll put it with a Donna twist with making it approachable, cost-focused,” Nauta said.
Donna, according to its website, costs upward of $99 per month for all features, excluding its advanced billing and role-based access control features. Access to all of Donna's features is priced for an unlisted “tailored” amount.
How It Works: To start the process, the Donna software reads the document. It labels any relevant information, such as clauses or information regarding party and jurisdiction. Next, the software attempts to understand the structure of the document and find any illogical or inaccurate usage of terms or references.
Nauta gave an example of how Donna can point out a single use of a term in the event the lawyer didn't use it correctly, explaining, “We can say, 'Hey, you've defined this term but never used it before.'” That notice provides a heads-up for lawyers to check if that term was used correctly.
The program's features include checking that every reference has a cross-reference and if the correct clause is referenced. Donna also scans for inaccurate literal and “convenience value” amounts of money, according to the software's website.
Along with its reference-checking feature, Donna analyzes the dictionary definition of words to ensure they are used correctly, Nauta explained.
Privacy Concerns: In the course of daily use, attorneys may want to take care with the system. While confidential information lawyers process through Donna is translated into numbers that the software then reads, users are still accountable for information left in its template, Nauta warned.
“With GDPR [General Data Protection Regulation], there may be PII [personally identifiable information] that is stored, the first responsibility is on the firm's end that the data isn't left there in the template,” he said.
Why It's Necessary: Nauta foresees lawyers in the coming years taking a more bring-your-own-device stance in the office when using software. Lawyers will buy software based on their individual needs and workflows and will not rely entirely on what their law firm provides, Nauta said.
Nauta, a nonlawyer, said his startup doesn't have legal expertise, but he thinks Donna can easily adapt to these workflows and devices.
“We really see Donna as the first step,” Nauta said. “We see an opportunity in the legal sphere, things we'll get different and automated. We see a lot of similarities with the internet of 10, 15 years ago.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 2Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 3The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 4Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Davis Wright Tremaine, Wilmer and More
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250