Law Society of Scotland Launches Tech Initiative to Spur Collaboration
The Law Society of Scotland recently launched LawscotTech, an effort to promote collaboration between the legal and technology sectors to drive innovation.
October 17, 2018 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Lawyers and technology experts just got one more reason to visit Scotland. LawscotTech is a new initiative founded by the Law Society of Scotland directed toward promoting technological advancements inside the legal industry. Those efforts include hosting networking events to facilitate relationships between legal and tech firms and support the ongoing development of new products from the initial idea all the way through to the final design.
Paul Mosson, executive director of member services and engagement at the Law Society of Scotland, believes that firms inside the commonwealth need to embrace new ways of working that drive efficiency and provide a competitive edge on the global stage.
“We're looking to find the answers that we haven't managed to find, and we're also looking to ask the questions we've never asked,” Mosson said. “And we believe that we do that by bringing the legal profession together with the technology experts that are already out there.”
LawscotTech is gearing up to host mingling events throughout Scotland. Lawyers can bring insights into the challenges facing their firms, which could in turn spark ideas from tech experts who are also in attendance from commerce or academia.
Mosson is hoping to attract firms of all sizes. One of the problems that LawscotTech is hoping to address is the prevalence of technologies that don't cater to Scotland's individual regulations and rules. Input from even the smallest of firms could help technology partners engaged through LawscotTech develop products tailored more closely to the region's needs.
“Perhaps the most important part of this is to get our profession energized and want to participate in this, to talk to the owner of a small firm who's probably never thought that they had anything to offer technology companies, to get them to understand that actually do,” Mosson said.
LawscotTech is most interested in advancements made across three key categories: tech that supports legal advice, tech that supports regulatory compliance and tech that supports dealmaking; specifically, the ways in which those processes can be streamlined and fortified against human error.
One way to do that is by cutting human beings out of the picture altogether. Mosson believes that when properly applied, artificial intelligence can take due diligence and significantly reduce the risk factor inherent to the kinds of multimillion-dollar transactions found in mergers and acquisitions work.
He also mentioned that the property acquisition process in England, a tangled web of public bodies, intermediaries and banks, might function more efficiently under a network made of wires instead of flesh and blood. It's all about creating a smoother, less frustrating experience for the client.
“This isn't replacing the role of a solicitor, this is enhancing the services provided, which is better for everybody,” Mosson said.
He thinks that it's possible for LawscotTech to serve as an inspiration for team-ups between other legal and tech sectors rooted in far-flung locations throughout the globe, so long as the people there are willing to work together.
“I think one of Scotland's greatest strengths is the fact that it does have a collaborative approach between business, government, the professional bodies, the regulators, they work well together and I think you need that in order for this to work,” Mosson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250