Meritas' New Cybersecurity Standard Requirement Is for Assuring Lawyers' Clients
Meritas has instituted a new cybersecurity requirement to showcase its members have a cybersecurity standard in place as clients demand more consistency.
October 17, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Meritas, a nonprofit association of law firms, now requires its law firm members to follow a new cybersecurity standard. The reason for this new standard? Law firms' clients.
“All of what you are seeing is because clients are requiring it of outside resource providers,” explained Tanna Moore, president and chief executive officer of Meritas.
Moore stated law firm clients have a heightened awareness of cybersecurity after recent breaches of law firms' confidential data. The 2016 Panama Papers, where Mossack Fonseca was breached and a plethora of data was exposed, leading to the firm's dissolution, inspired Meritas to develop a cybersecurity standard for the company and its member firms, Moore said.
“We [law firms] really have a lot of confidential information about clients; we need standards about how we store confidential client data,” she explained.
The Minneapolis-based company collaborated with a cybersecurity expert for nine months and announced its 10 cybersecurity standards that current and future Meritas members must follow. Meritas' new cybersecurity standards are:
1. Requiring a cybersecurity plan specifying what to do if a cybersecurity breach occurs;
2. Senior management commitment, which Moore called a “culture” requirement where senior management must be committed to safeguarding their data;
3. Yearly risk and compliance assessment;
4. Technical safeguards such as encryption;
5. Physical safeguards, which Moore defined as law firms having policies and procedures in place to ensure physical content and offices are secure;
6. Employee training;
7. Verifying a third-party service provider has a cybersecurity plan;
8. Having a business continuity plan in place to assess if the firm has “appropriate” backup;
9. Breach response;
10. Reviewing and updating cybersecurity plans.
Currently, penalties for not meeting the new standards haven't been set. “As the program is just being implemented, we are in the process of determining the long-term consequences,” Moore said. “At this point, we bring issues to the members' attention for them to resolve.”
The new cybersecurity standards are offered as an assurance to clients that law firms in the Meritas association are members of an organization that requires them to be equipped with cybersecurity standards. The way Meritas operates is that if a member law firm has client work that is out of the law firm's jurisdiction, it can refer a fellow Meritas member law firm to that client.
“If they are referring another firm in our organization, they are assuring that this firm has looked at and is aware of cybersecurity plans,” Moore explained.
Meritas has 181 law firm members spread across 90 countries, according to Meritas' website, and finding a simple core of cybersecurity requirements in a sea of differing international regulations was key, Moore said.
She added, “We wanted to be able to find the common denominator and simplify it so our firms would understand them.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Becomes 2nd State to Give Brain Waves Data Privacy Protections, With Mixed Reaction
Former FBI Cyber Expert on How AI Will Exacerbate Law Firms' Wire Transfer Vulnerabilities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250