'You Probably Want to Know Less': The Influence of Social Media on Labor Law
'Technology is racing way ahead of legal developments and the law it trying to keep up,' says Charles Fournier, a partner at Curley, Hurtgen & Johnsrud, at the Practising Law Institute's Employment Law Institute.
October 18, 2018 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
IBM Corp. associate general counsel Teri Wilford Wood warned Wednesday that inconsistent or weak social media policies at companies could foster shoddy hiring practices and expose employers to discrimination claims.
“There are things that can go wrong with social media. Yet, it is omnipresent in what we do and see in the workplace today,” Wood said, speaking at the Practising Law Institute's Employment Law Institute.
The influence of social media in hiring is among the emerging issues that are presenting new questions for employers. Labor and employment attorneys on Wednesday discussed the pitfalls, benefits and gray areas stemming from technology and social media use by workers.
“Technology is racing way ahead of legal developments and the law is trying to keep up,” said Charles Fournier, a partner at Curley, Hurtgen & Johnsrud in New York.
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your in-box with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
Fournier, previously senior vice president for employment law at NBCUniversal, said reigning in recruitment practices in certain industries can be difficult. In the entertainment arena, he said it's difficult to control “everyone who knows everybody” and stop rogue managers from mining social media.
Wood described IBM's recruitment practices as a “sophisticated approach,” and the review of social media sites—including LinkedIn, Indeed.com and Glassdoor—relate to job duties, professional experience and technical skills.
The lawyers said one best practice for crafting a social media practice is to remember that a one-size policy does not fill all scenarios, and that procedures should be customized to industries. Policies should cover all forms of online communication and conduct and they should include what, if any, social networking sites are permitted during working hours.
The policies should avoid restricting protected activities, such as employee speech related to working conditions. The National Labor Relations Board is currently weighing whether employees should be restricted from using company email for union activity. Any board ruling could confront all electronic communication.
Robert Kraus, founding and managing partner of New York's Kraus & Zuchlewski, said there is little case law surrounding employers' use of social media in hiring, but added, “From a legal perspective, you probably want to know less.”
Courts have grappled with cases about social media monitoring policies, and employers have faced challenges over termination or discipline of employees for social media use. Employees terminated for social media violations can present protected speech issues. “It's not often clear,” Kraus said.
Fournier said his training for new employees came with an admonition: “Don't believe that your personal Facebook page is truly personal. I'm sure I can link it to your employer.” He added: “When developing a social media policy, it needs to be clear the employee does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
Bring-your-own-device policies at companies can also blur lines and create extensive issues in discovery in any lawsuit, the attorneys said Wednesday. “It is something that is the wave of the present,” Wood said. “With it comes a lot of issues.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250