Law Firms Need to Assume Breach—And Invest Accordingly In Internal Defenses
Even the best-trained teams cannot keep an intruder from moving throughout a cloud environment if the house has no alarms and all the doors have all been left open. The key may lie in micro-segmentation.
October 19, 2018 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
The thought of a cyberattack strikes fear into the hearts of law firms every day. Yet rarely do partners take the necessary step back and ask: why are breaches having such an impact? The answer is simple—and so is the solution.
Breaches have a profound impact because firms are overly focused on securing their networks and data at the perimeter and not focused enough on what happens after an intruder gains a foothold. History shows that it is not a question of if but when an intruder will break through an organization's network defenses. This is what people mean when they say, “assume breach.” Security capabilities like multifactor authentication and firewalls help keep intruders out by securing the perimeter: closing off points of entry wherever possible. But intruders will break through—especially if they are a well-funded organization in a nation-state with hackers on salary.
Law firms can upend the landscape by making smart technological investments to secure their interior of their networks. Why is this so important?
Consider the infamous and public case of the Office of Personnel Management of the United States. One of the smallest agencies of the U.S. government, OPM serves as the “chief human resources” agency for the Federal government. In 2013, an advanced adversary broke past OPM's perimeter defenses, moved laterally throughout the network, and, because the hacker could dwell inside the network, the intruder found the crown jewel servers that held some of the nation's most sensitive data. The intruder stole the personally identifiable information of 21.5 million Americans.
The Need for Micro-Segmentation at Law Firms
A version of the OPM story plays out in almost every instance when an advanced intruder breaks into a cloud or data center that lacks internal security measures.
At its most basic level, micro-segmentation puts walls around databases and other vital applications and segments them away from the rest of the data environment. By micro-segmenting their networks, firms can establish an internal defense and prevent breaches from spreading. Within the suite of cybersecurity investments that an organization can make, it provides a deep foundation for cyberresilience.
Protecting the crown jewels
Prioritization matters for any effective security strategy, but especially when it comes to protecting an organization's most important data. Every organization has crown jewels within its information technology and data infrastructure that are vital to the organization's overall mission. For law firms, it could be the data management system (DMS) that stores client data. The security of a firm's crown jewels can impact the well-being of entire organizations and countries and they require extra protection beyond perimeter defenses. So firms need to start by identifying their crown jewels and mapping them within the data center and cloud environment to discover application dependencies and vulnerabilities.
Micro-segmentation secures a firm's most important information by providing robust internal controls within a network, much like the doors of a submarine. If a breach happens in one part of the hull, the doors can lock and keep the breach from spreading and reaching the crown jewels. Since every internal firewall is also an alarm station, micro-segmentation can turn each server into a sensor that can detect attempts to violate policy. When a bad actor can only move between 3 application hosts vs. 3,000, their chances of accessing and stealing critical data without being detected is severely limited. Plus, the smaller attack surface makes it easier and faster for IT to find bad actors once they are in because they cannot move everywhere to hide.
Today multifactor authentication, encryption, and micro-segmentation are all parts of the “new” security stack that helps minimize the likelihood and impact of a breach. Micro-segmentation provides a baseline, a foil against vulnerabilities and a final defense against in the event that an attacker gets through. It can be installed on any enterprise within the preexisting network infrastructure and works for both on-premises servers, clouds, containers, and data centers.
Conclusion
The purpose of cybersecurity technology is to help humans manage their cybersecurity risks with greater ease and effectiveness. Cyberspace is vulnerable. Attackers always find vulnerabilities in code and exploit human weaknesses. After a breach, to over-focus on specific perimeter vulnerabilities or instances of human error misses the larger strategic opportunity: no perimeter is perfect and even the best-trained teams cannot keep an intruder from moving throughout a cloud environment if the house has no alarms and all the doors have all been left open.
Micro-segmentation adopts an adversary-focused mindset and plans for breach. It takes just one foothold to gain immediate access to an insecure data center at a firm. When perimeter and user-focused defenses fail, as they will, firms require a robust internal defensive system to stop intruders and withstand attacks. A resilience-focused, defense in depth strategy will make the difference. Jonathan Reiber is Head of Cybersecurity Strategy at Illumio, a software company, and a Visiting Scholar at Berkeley's Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity. Former Chief Strategy Officer for Cyber Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Reiber is the author (with Arun Mohan Sukumar) of Asian Cybersecurity Futures: Opportunity and Risk in the Rising Digital World, published by Berkeley's Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250