Mitratech Builds Simplified TeamConnect Platform Focused on Mid-Sized Legal Ops
TeamConnect Essentials looks to leverage pre-configured matter types, dashboards and other tools to offer an out-of-the-box, more streamlined solution for mid-size legal departments.
October 22, 2018 at 09:01 AM
4 minute read
As the desire for legal operations grows beyond the Fortune 500, the need for legal tech providers to tailor their tools to this new market is following close behind. This rise in mid-size company legal operations has spurred technology provider Mitratech to offer a new version of its TeamConnect legal management platform—one more streamlined for out-of-the-box use.
Dubbed TeamConnect Essentials, the new SaaS solution takes TeamConnect and looks to simplify it. Rather than a tailored implementation, Essentials comes with pre-configured matter types, an invoice review process with rules engine that has billing guidelines, and a suite of analytics dashboards and reports that can help get handle on spend, alongside Microsoft Office plug-ins and other features.
The result, said Chris Kraft, senior vice president of product management at Mitratech, is a system that is easier to get up and running and maintain. While TeamConnect installs can often take six to nine months, he estimated Essentials installs taking four to six weeks. While customers can then configure the system further to their needs, speed and simplicity are at the forefront.
“More of this is out-of-the-box,” Kraft told Legaltech News. “Point of view and best practices are built in, there's pre-built templates for how they onboard new firms, and really the packaging of it is really easy for a smaller organization to get up and running.”
Customers can purchase the product on Mitratech's website, and the company will also be demonstrating the product at the ACC Annual Meeting. Pricing for Essentials is a SaaS-based subscription model based on the size of the legal department.
According to Kraft, Mitratech saw Essentials as a natural progression of its technology platform, especially as more and more mid-sized companies are adopting legal operations.
“We started to think about, the way we would deliver this product to a large enterprise, [mid-sized legal departments] were a bit overwhelmed by it,” Kraft said. “So we saw a really unique opportunity to take that feeling of being overwhelmed out of the process, pre-package it, and hand-hold them in a way to get this product up and running.”
But he also made sure to note that many of the companies Mitratech is targeting have millions of dollars in outside counsel spend, where even a five percent decrease in dollars spent due to better matter management is a sizeable return on investment.
“It's not like you're talking about a 10 person company here,” he explained. “You're talking about hundreds of thousands of employees, but the legal department just happens to be super efficient. They often have a lot of the same challenges, they just need something that's sized appropriately for them.”
As an example, Kraft pointed to the analytics capabilities of Essentials. He noted that when many of these legal departments want to get insight into their spend, they “have to go to their finance team, and oftentimes, that takes quite a bit to get a financial report from an ERP system.” The goal for the more streamlined offering, then, is to eliminate some of these unique pain points that legal departments with larger budgets may have already taken care of.
And certainly, this mid-size market is one Mitratech expects to continue to grow, as companies of all sizes are looking for greater insight into their data. Kraft explained, “What has happened over the past several years, with the growth of the CLOC Institute and this massive shift in thinking about legal operations as a strategic part of the legal department and the company, is even the smaller organizations are now investing and thinking about legal technology and process.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250