Could Consumer-Side Legal Tech Funding Be on the Rise?
Venture capital counsel who spoke to Legaltech News said business-consumer legal technology services seem to be catching on with users and investors are following, but time would tell if high-dollar amount investments would become common.
October 24, 2018 at 01:34 PM
3 minute read
In July, LegalZoom announced it raised $500 million. By mid-September, Atrium secured $65 million in new funding for its internet-based legal services geared toward startups. And last week, Court Buddy Co. Inc. revealed it raised $6 million in outside funding.
Venture capital counsel who spoke to Legaltech News said business-to-consumer legal technology services seem to be catching on, and investments are following. But time will tell if such high-dollar investments will become common.
According to a 2017 article in Medium, venture capital funding in legal tech startups increased 10 percent during 2011 to 2016. No data was available regarding how much has been invested in legal startups this year, but Legaltech News reported LegalZoom's $500 million investment was the largest in legal technology history.
Still, potential investors may be apprehensive to invest in consumer legal tech because of the regulations governing the legal profession, said Court Buddy co-founder James Jones, Jr: “To be quite frank, legal tech has been a hard sell to investors because it's highly regulated.”
He added that the various rules and regulations that vary from jurisdictions leads investors to “generally look at law as a difficult industry to crack.”
However, Jones' own company recently announced it acquired $6 million in funding. The three-year-old Court Buddy provides a la carte legal services and flat rates for clients seeking a solo practitioner, essentially acting as a communication liaison between attorneys and consumers.
The startup raised $6 million from investors NFX; First Round Capital; Kapor Capital, and existing investors LDR Ventures, Lightspeed's LSS Fund, Gingerbread Capital, UpHonest Capital, L.A. Women Angels and numerous angel investors, according to media reports.
The new investors now own 25 percent of the company, with co-founders James Jones Jr. and Kristina Jones retaining their majority shareholder status.
In 2017, the company also raised $1 million, making co-founder Kristina Jones the 14th African-American woman to raise over a million dollars in venture capital, according to the Miami Herald. The co-founders said they would use their new investments for market expansion, key hiring and research and development.
Richard Ginsberg, who chairs Winston & Strawn's technology and emerging companies practice group, said there's a need in the consumer market for such consumer-focused legal services, but it isn't clear if many others companies will secure multi-million dollar investments similar to LegalZoom.
“To compete directly with LegalZoom would be hard. There's other approaches companies can take to provide basic legal services,” he explained.
But Bryan Ito Springmeyer, a San Francisco-based attorney who has counseled angel and venture capital financing, added that while venture capital funding is mostly based on Big Law service providers, “if any of those companies are successful, venture capitals would be interested.”
Various business-consumer legal tech startups have found investors as well , though not all have offered services similar to LegalZoom's automated documents.
Earlier this year, Avvo was acquired by media and software services company Internet Brands Inc. for an undisclosed amount. However, under pressure from state bar associations that criticized Avvo for improper fee-splitting arrangements and unauthorized practice of law, Internet Brands announced Avvo Legal Services would discontinue in July. On Tuesday, Internet Brands relaunched Avvo as a lawyer search and ranking service with a free question-and-answer option.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250