Blockchain for More Than Just Crypto, but Presents New Legal Issues
A panel of experts at the Association of Corporate Counsel's annual meeting said on Tuesday that blockchain and smart contracts can be used for more than just cryptocurrency.
October 24, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A panel of experts at the Association of Corporate Counsel's annual meeting at the Austin Convention Center in Austin, Texas, said on Tuesday that blockchain and smart contracts can be used for more than just cryptocurrency. However the additional use of blockchain technology may create additional legal issues to consider.
Sean Murphy, a partner in the U.K. office of Norton Rose Fulbright and the leader of the firm's global fintech practice, said the possibilities are nearly endless. He said one of his clients is looking to leverage the blockchain to monitor their supply chain.
“One of my clients is a miner of a valuable commodity and one of the things they would love to be able to offer to consumers is the assurance that mine that this commodity came out of is not a mine that has ethical issues; that there isn't child slavery issues involved in that mine,” Murphy said.
The use of blockchain to track products in the supply chain has recently been pioneered by the retail sector. Following a two-year pilot program, Walmart announced the use of blockchain to track its lettuce to determine if it has salmonella.
Gregory Landua, the co-founder and CEO of Regen Network, said that Walmart's use of blockchain in this way ultimately saves the company money.
“Their upside is really making recalls of products. If you have a salmonella outbreak in lettuce and you know exactly the lettuce which is defective, it reduces their costs in the recall and reduces their liability too,” Landua explained. “There upside is on the risk mitigation side.”
However, Murphy explained that one of the issues that comes up is how the physical commodity is linked to the digital blockchain. “The solution will vary from product to product,” Murphy said.
Scott Kearns, senior legal director at Dell Technologies, said there are still unanswered questions of how to litigate blockchain and smart contract issues and disputes.
“We talked a lot about smart contracts and smart contracts are really code,” Kearns explained. “If you have to litigate something related to a blockchain, how are you going to actually do that? Are you going to have a coder come in to explain to the judge what was written?”
The panel was moderated by Andrew Lom, a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250