5 Bad IT-DR Practices and Why to Avoid Them
It can be tough to dedicate a large portion of budget and resources to building an IT disaster recovery (IT-DR) plan, but these practices could easily lead to catastrophe.
October 25, 2018 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
Disasters come in all shapes and sizes and they definitely don't discriminate. And while everyone knows the dangers that lurk around their firm's precious data, it can be tough to dedicate a large portion of budget and resources to building an IT disaster recovery (IT-DR) plan. However, disasters don't care about your IT talent, time or budget. With that in mind, here's some examples of the five biggest IT-DR failures I've seen and how you can avoid them.
Bad Practice: Not Keeping the IT-DR Plan Up to Date
Many firms make the mistake of not testing and keeping their plans up to date. In fact, a recent survey conducted by Bluelock Solutions from InterVision found that only 10 percent of the legal industry tests their plans more than once a year. This makes it nearly impossible to ensure effectiveness, or to have a clear understanding of changes to your IT environment. If your system has changed since the last check, different steps may be required for recovery and you'll never know if you don't test.
To avoid any issues that could arise and ensure maximum preparation, it's vitally important to test your IT-DR plan on a regular basis. I recommend that firms test their plan at least twice a year, but if your firm is under intense scrutiny from clients, or is being targeted for cyber breaches, it's a smart idea to test it even more.
Bad Practice: Not Building a Tiered Application Structure
Information is complicated and complex, and not all information can be recovered at the same speed. Trying to put every dataset into a one-size-fits-all solution is a complete waste of time and money. This type of plan is highly vulnerable and requires employees to sift through massive amounts of data before delivering to end users.
By making sure to match each dataset with the required recovery speed and capabilities, your firm can make this process much more efficient. Identify what needs to be recovered first and organize all the data into tiers based on priority. Using a more selective method, your firm will save money and utilize several solution types instead of bucketing everything into one inefficient option.
Bad Practice: Failing to Document the IT-DR Plan
This seems like a fairly simple step, but you'd be surprised at how many firms fail to write down their IT-DR plan. Many firms make the mistake of solely relying on their IT team to simply know what to do when a disaster occurs. However, if there's a new employee or someone who knows the plan isn't available, this method fails immediately.
Creating a step-by-step runbook with details on order of execution and everyone's role in a disaster scenario is a much more stable option. Runbooks should also have a contingency plan in place in case someone is absent.
Bad Practice: Failing to Properly Update the Runbook
Picture a disaster happening and you run to grab the runbook only to find it with outdated procedures. Unfortunately, that's the case for many firms when dealing with a disaster. Failure to update the runbook with any changes after testing the system can be detrimental.
Communication is the key to solving this issue. After testing is complete, meet with your IT team to discuss what went well and what needs improvement. Document these discussions and then make any necessary changes to the runbook. After changes are made, everyone should receive the latest version to avoid confusion during disaster recovery events.
Bad Practice: Completely Ignoring Possible Disasters
We can talk about runbooks and IT-DR plans all day, but if a firm completely ignores the possibility of disasters, they'll never have a proper protocol in place. Disasters don't just come in the form of fires and floods, they can include human error, cyber breaches, power outages, or even hardware failures. If you ignore the full spectrum of possibilities, your firm is left especially vulnerable and unprepared.
The tip for this one should be obvious: plan for everything and design your IT-DR plan to be flexible. Asses the current state of your IT systems and establish what it would require to recover that system. The goal should be to recover from situations with minimal disruption to operations.
Put Your Plan in Action
These bad practices are all too real for many law firms. It takes time and effort to carefully design and maintain the right disaster recovery system. However, this process is worth it in the long run to provide a smooth and fast return to normal operations following a disaster.
Jeff Ton is Senior Vice President of Product Development & Strategic Alliances at InterVision, a next-generation IT Services company, where he is responsible for driving the company's product strategy and vision. Jeff focuses on the evolving IT landscape and the changing needs of customers, ensuring InterVision's products and services meet client's needs and drives value in their organizations now and in the future. Ton has over 30 years of experience in business and information technology and previously served as CIO for Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana and Lauth Property Group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250