Stormy Seas Ahead? Maritime Industry Unprepared for Cyberattacks, Survey Says
Cyberattacks on the maritime industry could expose client data and have far-reaching collateral consequences for an array of U.S. businesses that are involved in importing, exporting or have other ties to the shipping world.
October 25, 2018 at 03:00 AM
4 minute read
The shipping industry needs to take cybersecurity far more seriously, according to a survey that emerged today—like a red sky in the morning—and the warning is not just for the maritime folks, but for any company that has dealings with them.
Cyberattacks on the maritime industry could expose client data and have far-reaching collateral consequences for an array of U.S. businesses that are involved in importing, exporting or otherwise have ties to the shipping world.
While nearly 40 percent of all the survey respondents said their maritime company had been targeted in a cyberattack in the past year, an alarming 64 percent indicated that their companies weren't prepared to deal with the fallout from a data breach.
That's according to Jones Walker, which surveyed 126 executives, chief information and technology officers, managers and other leaders for American port operators, cargo shipping companies and ship owners and operators. The latter group accounted for 60 percent of the survey respondents.
April Danos, information technology director for Louisiana's Port Fourchon, said in a statement that the results of the survey “demonstrate that every maritime industry stakeholder needs to assess its vulnerability to a cyber attack, take preventive action and determine how it will respond.”
Digging deeper into the survey results revealed not just a general lack of preparedness, but also a chasm between small and large maritime companies, the former of which were far less confident about their cybersecurity shields or their ability to respond to an incident.
Only 6 percent of the respondents from small companies and 19 percent of those from midsize companies said they were prepared to prevent a breach.
Meanwhile, 100 percent of the large company reps said they were ready. And that's good, because 80 percent of those same companies reported that they were targeted in cyberattacks over the past year. Maybe that's why 97 percent of the large companies reported that they carry cyber insurance coverage.
By contrast, the vast majority—92 percent—of small companies and 69 percent of the midsizers reported that they had no cyber insurance. The survey suggested they are far less likely to be cyberattack targets, however: 83 percent of small companies and 60 percent of midsize companies said they weren't targeted in the past year.
In 2012 then-FBI Director Robert Mueller famously said there “were only two types of companies: Those that have been hacked and those that will be.” So just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't.
Martin Davies, a professor of admiralty law and director at Tulane University's Maritime Law Center, stated that the survey “provides evidence of a worrying level of complacency among maritime industry operators about cyberattacks.”
He called for industry and political leaders to take action.
Other findings from the survey:
- Large and midsize companies view external attacks, such as malware and ransomware, as the biggest threat, while small companies were more concerned about internal negligence.
- Large companies reported that 31 percent of the cyberattacks they'd experienced in the past year were successful. Five percent of midsize companies reported successful breaches and small companies said they had not been breached.
- A majority of respondents from companies in all three size brackets said they planned to increase their cybersecurity budgets in the coming year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250