Bloomberg Law Debuts New Attorney Analytics Tool to Better Evaluate Outside Counsel
The new Attorney Analytics tool will provide stats on over 100,000 lawyers, from companies and cases they've represented in court to their biographical information.
October 26, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
In the digital age, looking at attorney stats can be like staring down the barrel of a never-ending baseball card collection. There's probably some useful information in there somewhere if you've got some reading glasses and two or three hours to kill.
Bloomberg Law is looking to simplify matters with Attorney Analytics, a new addition to its Litigation analytics tool that debuted earlier this week at the Association of Corporate Counsel conference in Austin, Texas. The product is meant to give users a sharper eye—or at least a better view—when it comes to evaluating outside counsel, and could fortify Bloomberg's position in the domain of legal analytics.
What it is: Attorney Analytics is an extension of the information already compiled on law firms, companies and federal district court judges inside Bloomberg Law's analytic suite.
According to David Kleiman, a manager on Bloomberg Law's product team, this newest feature will provide stats on over 100,000 lawyers, from companies and cases they've represented in court to more standard biographical information such as education and career history. It also tracks related news items and allows users to spot trends in a attorney's litigation history.
Why It's Necessary: The world has become increasingly cluttered with data, and one of the major forces driving the development of Attorney Analytics was the ability to target, organize and understand the information associated with research intensive tasks like litigation.
“It's really a way to quickly get and use the information you're looking for,” Kleiman said.
Users can boil data points down to the important criteria that maps the shape of a career. For example, if a firm was about to face a particular lawyer in court, they could access a “snapshot” of their opponent's case history, profiling who they've represented and their areas of experience.
It could also potentially save HR a step or two during the hiring process by providing a sort of unofficial resume. “Do they have experience in the types of cases that you're company is facing? Do they have experience in the specific jurisdictions where a case is being brought against your company?” Kleiman said.
Under the Hood: Attorney Analytics runs on a combination of machine learning and a team of legal data analysts that “teach” the algorithm how to pull the right information so that all the names and facts line up correctly. The biggest challenge is tracking 100,000 attorneys, 700-plus law firms and 3.5 million private companies, and normalizing the relevant information to a specific name.
“You could imagine all of the different ways that an attorney's name might be spelled on a federal docket, and that goes for a law firm and a company as well,” Kleiman said.
The Competition: Today's consumers have their pick of analytics: Companies such as Thomson Reuters, LexisNexis' Lex Machina, and Mindcrest all market products offering data-driven insight to provide firms with a competitive edge in court. Kleiman believes that Bloomberg's user-based approach will help Attorney Analytics stand out from the pack.
“We spent a lot of time focusing on the user experience and making it very easy for attorneys, even attorneys who aren't necessary familiar with technology or feel comfortable with technology,” Kleiman said.
He also pointed out Bloomberg's willingness to continually update its stockpile of data with new or updated information.
“Bloomberg also is well known for its company information and our dockets products, I think, is market leading,” Kleiman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 2Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
- 3Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part
- 4'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
- 5Judge Orders Acquittal of Ex-Prosecutor on 1 of 2 Counts in Misconduct Trial Over Ahmaud Arbery Case
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250