Enforcement Questions Remain as Vietnam Prepares to Implement Data Localization Law
Vietnam's cybersecurity law, set to go into effect in January 2019, requires any online service provider that collects, analyzes or processes Vietnamese users' personal data to host that data, and have a physical office, in the country.
October 29, 2018 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Vietnam passed a new cybersecurity law in June 2018 requiring companies that collect, analyze or process personal data from Vietnamese citizens to have a physical office and store users' data in the country.
Internet giants Facebook and Google, as well as U.S. lawmakers, have decried the law set to go into effect January 2019.
However, experts have advised companies to take heed of the new cybersecurity law and to take notice of how Vietnam's government is enforcing the regulation.
“In all fairness to Vietnam, it feels it's necessary to come up with a more robust cybersecurity law, that's to be expected,” said Yee Chung Seck, a partner in Baker McKenzie's Vietnam office. “Vietnam is not the first country to do so.”
Indeed, Vietnam joins the governments of China, Indonesia and South Korea in implementing similar cybersecurity legislation, said Gino Bello, FTI Consulting's senior director of computer forensics, technology.
Along with requiring companies to store Vietnamese users' personal data locally, the law also prohibits online service providers from transmitting or posting information that goes against the Vietnamese government or incites riots or “untruthful information,” Bello said. When Vietnamese authorities flag content as prohibited, companies have 24 hours to remove the content, he explained.
“Companies are also obligated to ensure effective monitoring process are in place … [and] verify users' information when they register activities on their sites to enable them to remove any content deemed inappropriate by the authorities,” he added.
However, Seck said the law is unclear on whether data collected on Vietnamese users can be transferred outside of the country as long as the data is also housed in Vietnam. He also noted there are concerns if the localized data will be safer. “[There's] anxiety over if it goes through proper procedures.”
In a plain reading of the law's requirements, Seck explained, the requirements would apply to a small cupcake shop in New York City that accepts online orders and delivers its product to a Vietnam citizen, because the law uses “a very broad definition of folks that provide services online.”
“Strictly speaking, if you take a broad sweep, it could mean everyone has to set up shop in Vietnam,” Seck said. However, Seck believes the online companies targeted for having localized data would be narrow.
Still, the new requirements also would likely create more expenses for affected companies.
“Companies are likely to see costs increase as they will now be required to set up local branches rather than storing in cloud-based offshore platforms,” FTI's Bello explained. Those expenses would include infrastructure, technology, data migration and acquiring and paying personnel.
With the new law, Vietnam follows in the footsteps other countries' governments that have drafted and implemented tougher online regulations to, they say, fight against “fake news.”
“Vietnam has that same anxiety as other countries … and they can manage and compel social media companies,” Seck said. “The tricky part is concerned [with] what is unlawful content, news that is fake, that can be subjective.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Fulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
- 2The FTC’s Noncompete Rule Is Likely Dead
- 3COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
- 4People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
- 5How I Made Partner: 'Be Open With Partners About Your Strengths,' Says Ha Jin Lee of Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250