Coding Abilities Becoming Valuable to Lawyers as Blockchain Tech Develops
Opportunities for lawyers with a firm grasp of technology are most robust in areas related to compliance or incident response. Hands-on experience with computer programming and coding could become more valuable to attorneys as legal blockchain technologies develop over the next five years.
November 01, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Consider that “Coding for Dummies” book to be a long-term investment.
The demand for lawyers with honest-to-goodness fingers to the keyboard coding experience hasn't fully taken off just yet. Legal minds that come with a handy technology attachment might have better luck finding jobs in an advisory or liaison capacity that touches on many of the practical issues facing today's businesses, everything from compliance issues to incident response plans following a breach.
But that could all change in the next five years as the need for hands-on coding experience rises in correlation with the growth of blockchain technologies.
“The adoption of highly technically skilled individuals has always been slow in the legal marketplace. Where most of those jobs are for the highly technical programmer skill sets that are married either with a legal degree or some kind of legal background tends to be at service providers or software companies that are playing in that legal AI or legal analytics or big data cloud space,” Jared Coseglia, founder and CEO of TRU Staffing Partners, said.
As far as reasons go, this one is pretty straightforward: Corporations want to consult technical experts about their technical problems. Lawyers typically don't enter into the picture until something as fluid as technology has to be made to fit the rigid shape of the law. In those instances, understanding the jargon or workflow at play can still afford a significant advantage.
According to Coseglia, lawyers who have a global perspective on the varying regulations, rules and policies governing the intersection of technology and the law are on the right track to highly sought-after positions and employment. He's never seen so many job descriptions requiring niche skill sets like familiarity with the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) pop up in such a short amount of time.
“There is way more demand than there is supply of attorney talent, particularly in what we'll call that two- to four-year associate level, that corporate counsel level that is maybe towards a five-year-plus experience, where they are a niche focus in the privacy/security data governance verticals,” Coseglia said.
It's better to get them while they're young. Brigham Young University's (BYU) law school will be offering a three-hour legal coding workshop presented by the educational organization Code180 on a recurring basis each semester. The idea isn't so much to create an army of hybrid lawyer/coders, but rather to instill a basic understanding that will help students and budding attorneys relate to industries that are increasingly dominated by tech.
Gordon Smith, dean of BYU Law, compares it to being a lawyer for Ford but not having the faintest idea about how cars are made. Knowing even a little something about how the wheels fit onto the frame could prove useful. The same goes for coding.
“It gives you a sense of timing; it gives you a sense of complexity and the adaptability of the code to different circumstances so that you're not just making strange demands of people who seem to have magic boxes,” Smith said.
Just because there is not currently a bustling marketplace for lawyers with strong coding skills doesn't mean it's not coming. Next semester, BYU will launch another class focused on blockchain technology that will move beyond theory and involve hands-on projects.
In the legal field, blockchain tech can be used to automate processes such as the execution of contracts and compliance reporting. This too should be of interest to students or other aspiring lawyers interested in one day finding gainful employment.
“I just had a long meeting with a law firm about this. They have 40 lawyers in a group dedicated to blockchain projects, and [a partner] said if you can train people in blockchain, we will hire them,” Smith said.
That demand might not be going away anytime soon. As blockchain progresses through its infancy over the next five years, Coseglia expects there to be a growing demand for programmers who can apply blockchain skills to legal tasks and initiatives such as smart contracts.
“I think that that's a really interesting field that has a lot of applicable skill sets that go beyond legal technology, but a really ripe opportunity to apply them to legal technology,” Coseglia said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250