Developers Have to Consider Client Needs for a Successful Relativity Integration
Relativity is an e-discover provider with more than 180,000 users. The platform's App Hub features contributions from dozens of different developers who are trying to address growing customer needs in the tech sphere.
November 01, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Most lawyers already know the one about how a bill becomes a law, and so for the sake of variety this is the story of how an app becomes part of Relativity. The e-discovery solutions provider has over 180,000 users all with a smorgasbord of different needs that make the company's App Hub both a practical necessity and a prospective showcase for partners looking to show-off their development skills and build brand awareness.
According to Drew Deitch, director of strategic partnerships at Relativity, the platform currently has more than 85 different developers represented on its App Hub. Those relationships typically begin with an inquiry email sent by prospective app-licants to [email protected] and the initial screening criteria is actually pretty simple.
“The biggest thing we look for when evaluating new apps is how their custom solution addresses the specific, unaddressed needs of our customers, specifically with solutions addressing unstructured data,” Deitch said.
E-discovery solutions provider QDiscovery recently integrated two additions to the App Hub. Qmobile allows lawyers to analyze mobile device data and received Relativity's award for Best Innovation in 2017. Its younger sibling, QPrivAlert, helps identify privileged conversations.
Pains were taken early in the development process to ensure that QDiscovery wasn't duplicating its efforts by funneling resources into answering a problem that Relativity would just roll out its own solution to 6 months later. The sweet spot exists somewhere just off the edge of the existing road map but still arrives at place that manages to enhance the platform's services.
“Whether it's provider partners like ourselves or maybe it's someone who's strictly a developer, they encourage them to look for ways to improve upon their platform, ways to extend the uses or different ways to use it,” Tricia Johnson, director of marketing at QDiscovery, said.
The forensics and management teams behind Qmobile and QPrivAlert were able to coordinate directly with a group at Relativity dedicated to offering advice or assistance during bumps in the onboarding process. Developers are also given access to a “digital sandbox,” a copy of Relativity that can be run in a virtual machine environment.
Justin Blessing, founder and CEO Compiled, relied on the sandbox while his company was developing a new version of its e-discovery software ReadySuite for the platform. The app allows users to upload images, production sets and load files with field data into Relativity.
“Without (the sandbox) it would be pretty difficult to test against, to develop against. That's been pretty crucial,” Blessing said.
He also made use of the Relativity DevHelp Community, an online forum where new developers can post questions and benefit from the experience of their predecessors. Blessing said ReadySuite wasn't subjected to a certification process, but that Relativity did want to see a demo of the finished project before it was integrated with the platform.
A core element of Compiled's customer base are law firms and service providers who are already using Relativity. Making ReadySuite available to them on that platform is good for business.
“Everyone is excited about our integration, so I thought that was a good sign,” Blessing said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 19 New Judges: District Court Jurists to Take Office in January
- 2Blocking $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
- 3Middletown Jury Awards $1.4 Million Verdict
- 4Anthropic Agrees to 'Guardrails' for Its AI Training to Protect Copyrighted Lyrics Pending Fight Over Fair Use
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Trenk Isabel; Connell Foley; Faegre Drinker; ABOTA Northern NJ Chapter
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250