Relativity Expands to Compliance Monitoring with Relativity Trace
The add-on to the base Relativity system focuses on proactive data monitoring in regulated markets as the company looks to go beyond e-discovery.
November 06, 2018 at 09:01 AM
3 minute read
Best known as an e-discovery giant, Relativity is taking its first major steps into expanding its platform into the adjacent compliance field with the release of a new offering: Relativity Trace.
Relativity Trace is an add-on to the core Relativity platform that focuses on proactively monitoring internal communications for compliance purposes. The platform is geared towards regulated industries, particularly financial services, with an eye towards preventing issues such as collusion and price fixing, bribery and corruption, or unsound investment management practices.
The offering is available through either Relativity or the cloud-based RelativityOne, though the company says Trace's automation makes it “optimized for RelativityOne.” In addition to the core Relativity license required for the add-on, Trace is priced “per person being monitored,” though no specific prices have been made available at this time. Trace is available by contacting Relativity through the company's website.
Jordan Domash, general manager of Relativity Trace, told Legaltech News that Trace has been a year in the making. The impetus to launch the platform came after speaking with financial services clients and service providers who are increasingly worried about the large illegal communications-related fines handed down by regulators worldwide.
“These are real issues that are causing a massive impact in certain industries, and we think that what Relativity has done to the legal community… we can provide that same transformative change to the proactive side of the compliance industry,” Domash said.
Relativity touts Trace as an end-to-end compliance solution, with a wide range of features specific to the offering. These include:
- Data ingestion, with automatic direct connections to more than 40 different data sources like Office 365 Bloomberg and Skype;
- Post-ingestion data processing, with automatic indexing and implementation of custom scripts like data normalization or quality assurance; and
- Rules to define relevant content and take action on data automatically, such as those that tag content automatically, and the ability to create alerts off of those rules.
Of course, as an add-on rather than a separate product, Trace also features the full suite of Relativity tools. Domash pointed Relativity Analytics in particular as having an impact when paired with Trace, as users can use the analytics to train a system over time to identify more compliance specific alerts unique to an organization. “I think the unique value of Relativity is applying this proven suite of analytical tools to superpower your compliance team's review process and go beyond just terms-based searching,” Domash said.
The expansion beyond just e-discovery into compliance is naturally part of the value proposition for Relativity as well. Domash noted that one of Trace's earliest customers bought a full implementation of Relativity specifically for the Trace add-on. And as more organizations begin to invest in compliance monitoring—Relativity's press release announcing Trace notes consultancy PwC as an early adopter—the company hopes to create an ecosystem of compliance-focused service providers similar to what it has in e-discovery.
And compliance monitoring may be the first expansion, but likely won't be the last stop for Relativity, Domash noted. “We think that by developing a hopefully large business outside of e-discovery, we can show that the Relativity platform is mature and extendable enough to be able to operate outside of e-discovery, and hopefully be a guidepost that our service providers or entrepreneurs can use to build other businesses externally as well.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250