Law Company Elevate Acquires LexPredict and Its Data Science, AI Technology
LexPredict, founded by legal technology researchers Dan Katz and Michael Bommarito, joins Elevate in the law company's quest to provide tighter integration of people and technology in its offerings.
November 14, 2018 at 02:02 PM
3 minute read
A key selling point for “New Law” alternative legal service providers is integrating technology with human skill for greater outcomes than one or the other could achieve alone. “AI or machine learning are fantastic technologies, but you have to go into them with open eyes,” said Elevate managing director of contract consulting Craig Conte to LTN in June. “AI is not magic. It's best to think of AI as machine learning and not some magic supercomputer.”
It's that marriage of people and technology that has driven law company Elevate to its newest acquisition: legal technology and consulting firm LexPredict. The acquisition, Elevate said, will allow it to marry its comprehensive service offerings with LexPredict's data science and artificial intelligence technology to create “more sophisticated technology-enabled solutions for law departments and law firms.”
Elevate and LexPredict have already worked together for a year, focusing on leveraging AI in M&A, due diligence and contract analysis for Cisco, the press release announcing the deal said. From here, the combined companies plan to focus on, among other things, adding AI-enabled intake, assessment and workflow to contract repositories; combining AI technology with managed services for use in regulatory work; leveraging AI for outside counsel billing guideline compliance; and litigation and transactional predictive modeling.
LexPredict was founded in 2013 by Daniel Martin Katz and Michael Bommarito as Quantitative Legal Solutions before rebranding to LexPredict in 2014, with a goal of predicting legal outcomes such as U.S. Supreme Court cases and congressional bills. Since then, the company has expanded into various products, services and advisory arms, including four product and investment subsidiaries.
Katz, now a Chicago-Kent College of Law professor, is a frequent legal tech analyst and speaker at industry events. At the NetDocuments ndElevate conference last week, he highlighted, in a keynote speech, the influence of alternative legal service providers (ALSPs), saying of the traditional legal structure, “the incumbents are under attack from a number of different directions,” including ALSPs among the Big Four accounting firms, legal technology, and even clients themselves.
In the press release announcing the deal, he added, “The most comprehensive solutions often require the integration of multiple disciplines. Joining forces with Elevate is the most effective way to bring those solutions to market more quickly.”
From the Elevate standpoint, vice president of innovation Pratik Patel noted, “We're merging our businesses to increase the pace at which we are integrating AI into our enterprise legal management suite, Cael ELM, and collaborating on solutions that are 'AI + HI'—artificial intelligence plus human intelligence.”
This mirrors Katz's vision of AI as being a piece of a puzzle. He explained at the ndElevate conference, “There's a lot more to this legal innovation conversation than robot lawyers. I've never met a robot lawyer; I'm sure there's one somewhere.”
The deal reflects a legal technology marketplace where the marriage of human intelligence and artificial intelligence is becoming the norm. Riverview Law, for instance, entered a 10-year contract with legal automation company Kim Technologies in August with a similar goal. UnitedLex, meanwhile, pointed to technology development as a positive outcome of its deal with European private equity firm CVC Capital Partners in September.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250