Law Company Elevate Acquires LexPredict and Its Data Science, AI Technology
LexPredict, founded by legal technology researchers Dan Katz and Michael Bommarito, joins Elevate in the law company's quest to provide tighter integration of people and technology in its offerings.
November 14, 2018 at 02:02 PM
3 minute read
A key selling point for “New Law” alternative legal service providers is integrating technology with human skill for greater outcomes than one or the other could achieve alone. “AI or machine learning are fantastic technologies, but you have to go into them with open eyes,” said Elevate managing director of contract consulting Craig Conte to LTN in June. “AI is not magic. It's best to think of AI as machine learning and not some magic supercomputer.”
It's that marriage of people and technology that has driven law company Elevate to its newest acquisition: legal technology and consulting firm LexPredict. The acquisition, Elevate said, will allow it to marry its comprehensive service offerings with LexPredict's data science and artificial intelligence technology to create “more sophisticated technology-enabled solutions for law departments and law firms.”
Elevate and LexPredict have already worked together for a year, focusing on leveraging AI in M&A, due diligence and contract analysis for Cisco, the press release announcing the deal said. From here, the combined companies plan to focus on, among other things, adding AI-enabled intake, assessment and workflow to contract repositories; combining AI technology with managed services for use in regulatory work; leveraging AI for outside counsel billing guideline compliance; and litigation and transactional predictive modeling.
LexPredict was founded in 2013 by Daniel Martin Katz and Michael Bommarito as Quantitative Legal Solutions before rebranding to LexPredict in 2014, with a goal of predicting legal outcomes such as U.S. Supreme Court cases and congressional bills. Since then, the company has expanded into various products, services and advisory arms, including four product and investment subsidiaries.
Katz, now a Chicago-Kent College of Law professor, is a frequent legal tech analyst and speaker at industry events. At the NetDocuments ndElevate conference last week, he highlighted, in a keynote speech, the influence of alternative legal service providers (ALSPs), saying of the traditional legal structure, “the incumbents are under attack from a number of different directions,” including ALSPs among the Big Four accounting firms, legal technology, and even clients themselves.
In the press release announcing the deal, he added, “The most comprehensive solutions often require the integration of multiple disciplines. Joining forces with Elevate is the most effective way to bring those solutions to market more quickly.”
From the Elevate standpoint, vice president of innovation Pratik Patel noted, “We're merging our businesses to increase the pace at which we are integrating AI into our enterprise legal management suite, Cael ELM, and collaborating on solutions that are 'AI + HI'—artificial intelligence plus human intelligence.”
This mirrors Katz's vision of AI as being a piece of a puzzle. He explained at the ndElevate conference, “There's a lot more to this legal innovation conversation than robot lawyers. I've never met a robot lawyer; I'm sure there's one somewhere.”
The deal reflects a legal technology marketplace where the marriage of human intelligence and artificial intelligence is becoming the norm. Riverview Law, for instance, entered a 10-year contract with legal automation company Kim Technologies in August with a similar goal. UnitedLex, meanwhile, pointed to technology development as a positive outcome of its deal with European private equity firm CVC Capital Partners in September.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1M&A Transactions and AB 1824: Navigating New Privacy Compliance Challenges
- 2Devin Nunes, Former California GOP Congressman, Loses Move to Revive Defamation Suit
- 3Judge Sides With Retail Display Company in Patent Dispute Against Campbell Soup, Grocery Stores
- 4Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 5Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250