Cornell Students Develop AI-Powered Apps to Bolster Legal Aid Efforts
The apps, powered by technology from Neota Logic, are intended to provide students with hands-on technical experience and solve challenges facing today's legal aid organizations.
November 16, 2018 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
The upcoming final for a Cornell Law School course won't include writing an exam or filling bubble answer sheets. Instead students are presenting apps they created to solve challenges facing today's legal aid organizations.
On Dec. 3 at the Cornell Tech campus, J.D., LL.M. and MBA Cornell students are set to present their custom-made legal apps for the first time. The apps are an accumulation of a new semester-long course “Delivering Legal Services Through Technology.” Students will be judged by Cornell Law School's dean, the president of Bloomberg Law and the chief knowledge officer of Shearman & Sterling.
The students were placed into three teams to address the legal challenges faced by Pine Tree Legal Assistance, Legal Assistance of Western New York and Canine Companions for Independence.
The organizations were chosen because they showed the most interest and eagerness, said Littler Mendelson chief knowledge officer Scott Rechtschaffen. Students spoke to the three legal service providers, figured out what the provider's clients needed and created apps to address those needs.
Specifically, the app built for Pine Tree Legal Assistance interviews and assesses claims of housing discrimination and—when appropriate—prepares the initial paperwork needed to pursue a claim. Legal Assistance of Western New York's app provides guidance to New York residents considering filing for bankruptcy and schedules a follow-up meeting with staff if bankruptcy is deemed an appropriate option.
Students also created an app for Canine Companions that allows dog owners and managers of public property to quickly find the legal rights a dog owner has based on the type of property access sought.
Rechtschaffen, who is an adjunct professor of the course, brought in CIOs and lawyers to provide students with first-hand accounts of legal embracing technology. Legal tech AI company Neota Logic also came in to teach students how to use its AI-powered software to build the apps they'll be judged on.
“The instructors have brought in thought leaders in legal technology,” said Cornell Law Dean Eduardo Peñalver. “It's been a great introduction to students with AI, AI in the legal practice and getting their hands a little dirty.”
Peñalver said the impetus for the course came after a professor used Neota software in a Cornell immigration program last year. Neota isn't new to supporting law education, having partnered previously with Georgetown University, Melbourne University, University of New South Wales, University of Technology Sydney, Thompson Rivers University and Touro College, according to the company's website.
Kevin Mulcahy, director of education at Neota, said the tech company is set to partner with five additional U.K. schools by spring. Coding programs are becoming a necessity in the legal industry, he said. “[The] next generation of lawyers need to know how to develop applications.”
Peñalver shared those sentiments. “This may not be the particular product they use when they get out into the legal practice, but the hope is after taking this course that it plants a seed in their mind to … stay abreast of technology to be efficient practitioners,” Peñalver said.
Mulcahy added that the reward for students developing these apps comes from learning a new skill and using their legal knowledge to provide assistance.
“The students value it because they know they are getting practical, hands-on experience,” he said. “They enjoy it because they are building something real.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250