Third-Party Breaches Are a Threat—And Many Companies Aren't Ready
A new report from the Ponemon Institute found that most companies think third-party data breaches are a growing threat, but few companies have taken steps to mitigate the risk.
November 21, 2018 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Third-party data breaches are becoming the new norm, but most companies aren't taking important steps to protect themselves.
Ponemon Institute's third annual “Data Risk in the Third-Party Ecosystem” study, released Monday, found that 59 percent of respondent companies experienced a data breach caused by a third party or vendor. Another 22 percent of respondents said they didn't know if they had been impacted by a third-party data breach over the past year.
Ponemon's study was sponsored by global compliance and risk management solutions Opus and surveyed more than 1,000 chief information security officers from a variety of industries in the U.S. and U.K.
American companies were more likely to say they'd experienced a third-party breach, at 61 percent. According to the report, that's a 5 percent increase from last year and a 12 percent increase from 2016. More than 75 percent of all respondents said third-party data breach incidents are on the rise.
“It's growing,” Lee Kirschbaum, the senior vice president and head of product, marketing and alliances for Opus told Corporate Counsel. ”It's not getting better, it's getting worse, especially in the U.S.”
But only 16 percent of respondents said their companies are “highly effective in mitigating third-party risks.” Nearly two-thirds of companies don't keep a comprehensive inventory of third parties. Most respondents cited lack of centralized control, lack of resources and the complexity of third-party relationships as the reason for not keeping a comprehensive inventory.
Dov Goldman, the vice president of innovation and alliances of Opus, said it's important that companies mitigate the risk of third-party breaches.
“The third-party ecosystem is an ideal environment for cyber criminals looking to infiltrate an organization, and the risk only grows as these networks become larger and more complex,” Goldman said in a press release. “To stay ahead of the risk, companies and executives need to collaborate around plans for third-party detection and mitigation that supports automated technology and strong governance practices.”
Most respondents said their company's management of third-party risks is not effective or a priority, that they don't have sufficient resources to manage those relationships and that they're unaware of whether vendors are doing enough to prevent a breach.
Some companies, however, have been effective at preventing third-party breaches from impacting them. Ponemon's study highlighted tactics those organizations have used to stay protected.
Respondents said best practices include evaluating security and privacy practices of third parties, keeping a comprehensive inventory of third parties used, requiring third parties to provide notice when a breach happens and including the board of directors in risk management programs.
“A takeaway for me was that so many companies just weren't doing [best practices],” Kirschbaum said. “I don't think it's obvious to the market.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250