QDiscovery Acquires Northeast E-Discovery Provider Evidox
The deal increases QDiscovery's geographic and personnel scope, as CEO David Barrett said the two were a good cultural fit because they are 'laser-focused on client service.'
November 27, 2018 at 08:31 AM
4 minute read
QDiscovery is looking to bolster its bench as it acquires e-discovery provider Evidox, joining what has already been a crowded 2018 year for e-discovery M&A activity.
Evidox provides a host of e-discovery services, including preservation, collection, processing, hosting, production and presentation of electronic evidence. A large presence in the northeast particularly, Evidox has offices in Boston and Portland, Maine. The deal joins Evidox with QDiscovery, which is known for its full forensic analysis division and apps such as QPrivAlert and QMobile Insight.
The two companies will continue to operate under their own names post-deal, while making their combined services available for all clients. A QDiscovery press release said all Evidox employees will remain with the company, including CEO and co-founder Jim Berriman and chief strategy officer Dana Conneally. Financial details of the transaction have not been disclosed.
Speaking with Legaltech News yesterday, QDiscovery CEO David Barrett said that acquiring Evidox was an opportunity to expand the New London, Connecticut-based QDiscovery's geographic and personnel scope. But when it comes to M&A, he said, the “number one thing that we are always evaluating is cultural fit.”
“Both of these organizations are laser-focused on client service, because the number one thing in our business—and I think folks sometimes forget about this—is that we are a service business,” Barrett said.
That view was echoed by Evidox's Conneally, who called client service “the cornerstone of the business” since the company originally opened in 2006
“Because our growth was so curated over the years and organic, we wanted to make sure that as we considered possible partners or being acquired, it had to be the fit that David described,” Conneally said. While he and Berriman were originally skeptical that the perfect fit was out there, “it became obvious that not only did it exist, but maybe fit better than we could have imagined.”
Both sides also noted their employees' depth of experience as a mutual attraction, with Evidox's representatives saying that keeping the team in tact was a key consideration in looking for a partner. Berriman added, “One thing that pleased us about QDiscovery as we got to know them is that they are old-school e-discovery. By that I don't mean that they're not modern, I mean that they came out of that same kind of client-centric, service-centric background that our clients need.”
Neither side expects many changes for either QDiscovery or Evidox customers outside of a deeper bench to call upon and, particularly for Evidox customers, new technologies to draw upon. Conneally noted that Evidox customers will now have for the first time access to a Relativity hosting platform as well as QDiscovery-developed technologies like QMobile text message processing.
“It's a technology that we had developed more ad hoc internal at Evidox … It's something that because our bench wasn't as deep as we'd like it to be, when that sort of request came in, we struggled to meet it,” Conneally explained concerning text message processing. “We provided some technology to help our clients, but as a combined entity, that's a good example of the type of offering” they can provide more easily.
The e-discovery M&A market has continued to be active as we move close to the end of 2018. In late October, Consilio announced the acquisition of DiscoverReady, while in September Nuix acquired Ringtail from FTI Consulting. 2018 has also seen CloudNine's acquisition of LexisNexis' e-discovery suite, Catalyst's acquisition of TotalDiscovery, and Epiq's acquisition of Garden City Group, among others.
For Barrett's part, he felt QDiscovery's turn in the e-discovery consolidation carousel strengthens what he views as a unique market position.
“The size that we are, we are able to respond to any project that's out there. … Yet we remain nimble enough to be able to move quickly, make good decisions, and stay laser-focused on client service,” Barrett said. “I think there's an advantage for a company of our size to perhaps be able to do that a bit easier.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
- 2Remembering Ted Olson
- 3Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 4Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 5Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250