Law Departments' Legal Spend Up as Needs Increase: Survey
HBR Consulting's 2018 Law Department Survey indicated that more than one-third of legal departments said expanding tech use was a challenge, while an all-time high had matter management and e-billing systems in place.
November 28, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
After no change in total legal spending year over year between 2016 and 2017, law departments' total legal spending was up five percent last year, according to a new survey.
HBR Consulting's 2018 Law Department Survey, released today, indicates that the uptick in total legal spending correlates with increased legal needs.
The survey from the consultancy for legal organizations and corporations is in its 15th year and includes data from more than 250 participants. Respondents from the survey reported a median revenue of $9.5 billion for their companies, and the median total legal spend was $30.6 million.
In addition to total legal spending, median legal spend both internally and via outside counsel was up by three percent this year.
Given “the overall increase in legal work, law departments have to invest more in their legal-services delivery, whether it's internally or getting external resources to support the volume,” said Lauren Chung, HBR Consulting's managing director and the editor of the survey.
A large majority, 81 percent, of departments reported an expectation that their legal needs will continue to increase in the next year, citing commercial contracts, regulatory compliance and mergers and acquisitions as the top practices areas likely to require legal attention next year.
Thirty-four percent of departments reported to have increased their total number of lawyers, and a majority, 52 percent, reported an increase in total legal staff, including nonlawyers—a figure that is up from last year's 44 percent.
Forty percent of departments expect attorney staffing to increase next year, up from 31 percent last year.
Law departments “continue to be conscientious of cost while not sacrificing quality or effective service delivery,” Chung said.
“Cost control and cost management” continues to be one of law departments' greatest challenges, as reported by 60 percent of them. The most commonly cited tactics for handling increased legal work are boosting the workload of existing resources (41 percent) and expanding the use of current technology (37 percent).
For example, nearly one-fourth, 24 percent, of departments reported plans to move to or explore new matter management and e-billing systems within the next 12 months. This is on top of the 80 percent of departments reporting that they already have such systems in place—an all-time high for the survey.
In addition, contract management systems, AI technology and legal spend analytics also are on the horizon for some departments, with 29 percent, 28 percent and 26 percent of department respondents planning to implement the measures, respectively, in the next couple of years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250