Attorneys Most Vulnerable to Biometrics, Cloud and Phishing Attacks: Survey
Consumer credit reporting agency Experian highlighted three types of hacks that could hit lawyers and law firms hard.
December 04, 2018 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
Experian has released its sixth annual Data Breach Industry Forecast, which highlights six key areas where companies and individuals should be aware of possible data breaches. It also singled out lawyers as specifically being easy prey to biometric, cloud and phishing cyberattacks.
The recent news of Marriott's data breach and other headline-grabbing events show how lawyers are counseling their clients through massive data breaches. But the cyberattacks should also remind lawyers and their firms to safeguard their own technology.
“They need to be just as mindful of their cybersecurity requirements as the people in the headlines,” said Michael Bruemmer, vice president of the data breach resolution group and consumer protection at Experian.
“We have serviced a number of breaches of law firms and associations,” he added. “The most common root cause was email phishing attacks … Now that the dark web allows for basic kits for unsophisticated hackers with ill intentions, [they] can easily get spoofing attacks.”
Legal can also fall victim to their biometrics, such as ID sensors and facial recognition data, being stolen and used for unauthorized actions. Biometric data can even be altered when it's first recorded.
“Expect hackers to take advantage not only of the flaws found in biometric authentication hardware and devices, but also of the collection and storage of data,” added Experian in its report released Monday.
The report noted the pervasiveness of biometric systems, citing a Veridium study that claimed 63 percent of IT professionals are implementing or planning to implement a biometric system. That large usage rate may be based on regulations that require or suggest dual password assistance.
Bruemmer pointed to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, for instance, which requires companies to use multiple solutions to protect data, although it doesn't specifically suggest biometrics as a measure. However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) does recommended biometrics to safeguard data, Bruemmer said.
The growing use and acceptance of biometrics is mirrored by the expansive use of cloud-based software to store data as well.
“There's a ton of data on the cloud, and a lot of global law firms are storing their data on the cloud,” Bruemmer said, adding that nine out of 10 IT professionals worry over the cloud's security.
Indeed, it's not only IT professionals who are concerned. A recent survey by the American Bar Association found 60 percent of lawyers are concerned about the security and confidentiality of the cloud.
Bruemmer said the newness of cloud security and most servers being offsite are valid reasons for concern. “That's why it made it onto the prediction list, not just because of awareness [but] there perhaps is less control because it's farther away.”
Those concerns may be legitimate. In October 2018, for instance, Foley & Lardner suffered what it called a “cyber event” that disrupted its IT system but left its client data intact. Last year, DLA Piper was also affected for hours after a ransomware attack shut down numerous offices' computers and phones.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250