Attorneys Most Vulnerable to Biometrics, Cloud and Phishing Attacks: Survey
Consumer credit reporting agency Experian highlighted three types of hacks that could hit lawyers and law firms hard.
December 04, 2018 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
Experian has released its sixth annual Data Breach Industry Forecast, which highlights six key areas where companies and individuals should be aware of possible data breaches. It also singled out lawyers as specifically being easy prey to biometric, cloud and phishing cyberattacks.
The recent news of Marriott's data breach and other headline-grabbing events show how lawyers are counseling their clients through massive data breaches. But the cyberattacks should also remind lawyers and their firms to safeguard their own technology.
“They need to be just as mindful of their cybersecurity requirements as the people in the headlines,” said Michael Bruemmer, vice president of the data breach resolution group and consumer protection at Experian.
“We have serviced a number of breaches of law firms and associations,” he added. “The most common root cause was email phishing attacks … Now that the dark web allows for basic kits for unsophisticated hackers with ill intentions, [they] can easily get spoofing attacks.”
Legal can also fall victim to their biometrics, such as ID sensors and facial recognition data, being stolen and used for unauthorized actions. Biometric data can even be altered when it's first recorded.
“Expect hackers to take advantage not only of the flaws found in biometric authentication hardware and devices, but also of the collection and storage of data,” added Experian in its report released Monday.
The report noted the pervasiveness of biometric systems, citing a Veridium study that claimed 63 percent of IT professionals are implementing or planning to implement a biometric system. That large usage rate may be based on regulations that require or suggest dual password assistance.
Bruemmer pointed to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, for instance, which requires companies to use multiple solutions to protect data, although it doesn't specifically suggest biometrics as a measure. However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) does recommended biometrics to safeguard data, Bruemmer said.
The growing use and acceptance of biometrics is mirrored by the expansive use of cloud-based software to store data as well.
“There's a ton of data on the cloud, and a lot of global law firms are storing their data on the cloud,” Bruemmer said, adding that nine out of 10 IT professionals worry over the cloud's security.
Indeed, it's not only IT professionals who are concerned. A recent survey by the American Bar Association found 60 percent of lawyers are concerned about the security and confidentiality of the cloud.
Bruemmer said the newness of cloud security and most servers being offsite are valid reasons for concern. “That's why it made it onto the prediction list, not just because of awareness [but] there perhaps is less control because it's farther away.”
Those concerns may be legitimate. In October 2018, for instance, Foley & Lardner suffered what it called a “cyber event” that disrupted its IT system but left its client data intact. Last year, DLA Piper was also affected for hours after a ransomware attack shut down numerous offices' computers and phones.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250