Marriott Cyberattackers May Be Playing Longer Game With Stolen Information
The Marriott breach that potentially compromised the information of up to 500 million people may wind up being more memorable for nature of the data that was targeted and the patience the intruders displayed.
December 04, 2018 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
TripAdvisor might want to consider adding a “breach” category. Last Friday, Marriott announced that an unauthorized party had gained access to its Starwood guest reservation database, potentially compromising the information of up to 500 million guests.
Those numbers would constitute more than twice the number of people affected by the Equifax breach and fall second only to two separate incidents at Yahoo in terms of extent.
But the incident might wind up being more memorable for nature of the data that was targeted and the patience the intruders apparently displayed in extracting sensitive financial information from the Starwood system.
According to a statement released Friday, the compromised database included financial information like encrypted payment card numbers, identifying information such as birth dates and passport numbers, and personal preferences like a customer's preferred method of communication. The intruder had copied and encrypted data and taken steps toward removing it.
While it's still early in the investigation, Paige Boshell, a managing member at Privacy Counsel LLC, thought it was odd that the bad actor(s) involved took the time to copy and encrypt the data without installing ransomware or seizing the target information posthaste.
“The involvement of payment card data indicates that there might be a financial criminal motive, and that's usually what we see—but it's not entirely clear that it was limited to that because usually, if there's a financial motivation, you take the credit card information and get out,” Boshell said.
On the other hand, Zohar Pinhasi, CEO of the cybersecurity firm MonsterCloud, didn't find that situation to be unusual at all. His business deals regularly with clients who have their personal information stolen and then used as blackmail material by bad actors.
Passwords captured in these kinds of attacks can open the doors to all kinds of embarrassing or sensitive information, since people tend to use the same familiar combination across numerous platforms and accounts. In this case, the Starwood guest reservation database may have represented an attractive starting point because the names inside typically belong to people who can afford to pay a $1,000 bitcoin ransom.
“Social engineering is the name of the game, and the more creative you are with this kind of information, the better chances you have to extract money from victims,” Pinhasi said.
Last Friday's release from Marriott said the company has reported the incident to law enforcement and is continuing to support the investigation. A dedicated website and call center has been established to answer questions, and impacted guests have been granted free enrollment with WebWatcher, a tool that monitors sites where consumer information is shared for a consumer's data.
Boshell said that determining the breadth of the harm done—and whether any data was actually removed from the system—will be crucial to the hotel chain's strategy moving forward.
“If there's not been any harm and Marriott can act to prevent that or help the consumer mitigate that, that could alleviate the repercussions for both Marriott and the consumers,” Boshell said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250