Marriott Cyberattackers May Be Playing Longer Game With Stolen Information
The Marriott breach that potentially compromised the information of up to 500 million people may wind up being more memorable for nature of the data that was targeted and the patience the intruders displayed.
December 04, 2018 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
TripAdvisor might want to consider adding a “breach” category. Last Friday, Marriott announced that an unauthorized party had gained access to its Starwood guest reservation database, potentially compromising the information of up to 500 million guests.
Those numbers would constitute more than twice the number of people affected by the Equifax breach and fall second only to two separate incidents at Yahoo in terms of extent.
But the incident might wind up being more memorable for nature of the data that was targeted and the patience the intruders apparently displayed in extracting sensitive financial information from the Starwood system.
According to a statement released Friday, the compromised database included financial information like encrypted payment card numbers, identifying information such as birth dates and passport numbers, and personal preferences like a customer's preferred method of communication. The intruder had copied and encrypted data and taken steps toward removing it.
While it's still early in the investigation, Paige Boshell, a managing member at Privacy Counsel LLC, thought it was odd that the bad actor(s) involved took the time to copy and encrypt the data without installing ransomware or seizing the target information posthaste.
“The involvement of payment card data indicates that there might be a financial criminal motive, and that's usually what we see—but it's not entirely clear that it was limited to that because usually, if there's a financial motivation, you take the credit card information and get out,” Boshell said.
On the other hand, Zohar Pinhasi, CEO of the cybersecurity firm MonsterCloud, didn't find that situation to be unusual at all. His business deals regularly with clients who have their personal information stolen and then used as blackmail material by bad actors.
Passwords captured in these kinds of attacks can open the doors to all kinds of embarrassing or sensitive information, since people tend to use the same familiar combination across numerous platforms and accounts. In this case, the Starwood guest reservation database may have represented an attractive starting point because the names inside typically belong to people who can afford to pay a $1,000 bitcoin ransom.
“Social engineering is the name of the game, and the more creative you are with this kind of information, the better chances you have to extract money from victims,” Pinhasi said.
Last Friday's release from Marriott said the company has reported the incident to law enforcement and is continuing to support the investigation. A dedicated website and call center has been established to answer questions, and impacted guests have been granted free enrollment with WebWatcher, a tool that monitors sites where consumer information is shared for a consumer's data.
Boshell said that determining the breadth of the harm done—and whether any data was actually removed from the system—will be crucial to the hotel chain's strategy moving forward.
“If there's not been any harm and Marriott can act to prevent that or help the consumer mitigate that, that could alleviate the repercussions for both Marriott and the consumers,” Boshell said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
- 2MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
- 3Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
- 4People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250