Kuro Group, ONE Discovery Partnership Eyes Cheaper Option to Cloud-Based E-Discovery
Kuro Group will allow ONE Discovery clients to rent out IT infrastructure on which to host the e-discovery software. The offering aims to be a cheaper, flexible option to SaaS-based services.
December 06, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Legal technology management company Kuro Group and ONE Discovery have announced a partnership to provide clients with a cost-efficient new way to host e-discovery software through allowing them to rent IT infrastructure.
As part of the partnership, Kuro, which launched in 2016 to help legal departments and law firms implement e-discovery software, will host ONE Discovery's software on its OnRamp program. Alex Lewis, co-founder and chief strategy officer at Kuro Group, defined OnRamp as a program that allows e-discovery clients to “create an environment where they can come in and rent the software and servers and utilize it as much as they want without getting per GB charges.”
Such an option, he explained, can be less costly than deploying e-discovery products on premise or using a cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) offering. “The cheapest way to do discovery is stand up the servers, run the software and train your staff on it,” he noted.
ONE Discovery will be the first e-discovery platform offered through the program. At first glance, OnRamp can seem similar to SaaS offerings—both essentially allow e-discovery clients to outsource IT infrastructure. But Lewis notes that there are differences between the two in the level of control one has, and importantly, the price.
“I think that the main differences are the pricing structures,” he said. “Where a SaaS-based product is typically based on a per GB hosting model, the OnRamp model is based on an environment so you are able to gain more control over your environment … [one is] charged per servers and hardware as opposed to charge per GB.”
Those looking to rent out infrastructure like servers, however, would likely need an IT professional on staff to understand what their firm or company needed, and periodically review their needs according to evolving e-discovery demands.
SaaS providers, therefore, may be more appealing to those without IT professionals in-house. But a service like OnRamp could potentially be a better option to those whose e-discovery cases are unpredictable and can vary greatly by size and resources needed.
Of course, the cost to rent IT infrastructure can vary greatly depending on the data that needs to be stored, the specific type of infrastructure needed and how much staff is required to maintain and update the IT assets.
To be sure, the Kuro and ONE Discovery's move to launch what they see as a more cost-effective option for e-discovery clients will likely come as welcome news to many, especially corporate legal departments. Zapproved's 2018 Corporate E-Discovery Benchmarking Report, a survey of 185 corporate e-discovery professionals released in August 2018, found that 41 percent of respondents prioritize reducing e-discovery costs.
To meet clients' cost-cutting demands, e-discovery companies like Relativity, Compliance Discovery Solutions, Catalyst and many others have moved to host their e-discovery products on the cloud, in effect becoming SaaS providers. Some, like Relativity and Logikcull, have also looked to meet their clients' demands by offering different tiers of pricing depending on the amount of users accessing their product.
ONE Discovery and Kuro, however, believe they are the first to launch a service around renting IT infrastructure for e-discovery. Lewis, however, noted that launching such a service is “not rocket science,” and that others will likely follow suit if such a model catches on.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
- 2Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 3In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 4Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
- 5Disney Legal Chief Sees Pay Surge 36%
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250