Kuro Group, ONE Discovery Partnership Eyes Cheaper Option to Cloud-Based E-Discovery
Kuro Group will allow ONE Discovery clients to rent out IT infrastructure on which to host the e-discovery software. The offering aims to be a cheaper, flexible option to SaaS-based services.
December 06, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Legal technology management company Kuro Group and ONE Discovery have announced a partnership to provide clients with a cost-efficient new way to host e-discovery software through allowing them to rent IT infrastructure.
As part of the partnership, Kuro, which launched in 2016 to help legal departments and law firms implement e-discovery software, will host ONE Discovery's software on its OnRamp program. Alex Lewis, co-founder and chief strategy officer at Kuro Group, defined OnRamp as a program that allows e-discovery clients to “create an environment where they can come in and rent the software and servers and utilize it as much as they want without getting per GB charges.”
Such an option, he explained, can be less costly than deploying e-discovery products on premise or using a cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) offering. “The cheapest way to do discovery is stand up the servers, run the software and train your staff on it,” he noted.
ONE Discovery will be the first e-discovery platform offered through the program. At first glance, OnRamp can seem similar to SaaS offerings—both essentially allow e-discovery clients to outsource IT infrastructure. But Lewis notes that there are differences between the two in the level of control one has, and importantly, the price.
“I think that the main differences are the pricing structures,” he said. “Where a SaaS-based product is typically based on a per GB hosting model, the OnRamp model is based on an environment so you are able to gain more control over your environment … [one is] charged per servers and hardware as opposed to charge per GB.”
Those looking to rent out infrastructure like servers, however, would likely need an IT professional on staff to understand what their firm or company needed, and periodically review their needs according to evolving e-discovery demands.
SaaS providers, therefore, may be more appealing to those without IT professionals in-house. But a service like OnRamp could potentially be a better option to those whose e-discovery cases are unpredictable and can vary greatly by size and resources needed.
Of course, the cost to rent IT infrastructure can vary greatly depending on the data that needs to be stored, the specific type of infrastructure needed and how much staff is required to maintain and update the IT assets.
To be sure, the Kuro and ONE Discovery's move to launch what they see as a more cost-effective option for e-discovery clients will likely come as welcome news to many, especially corporate legal departments. Zapproved's 2018 Corporate E-Discovery Benchmarking Report, a survey of 185 corporate e-discovery professionals released in August 2018, found that 41 percent of respondents prioritize reducing e-discovery costs.
To meet clients' cost-cutting demands, e-discovery companies like Relativity, Compliance Discovery Solutions, Catalyst and many others have moved to host their e-discovery products on the cloud, in effect becoming SaaS providers. Some, like Relativity and Logikcull, have also looked to meet their clients' demands by offering different tiers of pricing depending on the amount of users accessing their product.
ONE Discovery and Kuro, however, believe they are the first to launch a service around renting IT infrastructure for e-discovery. Lewis, however, noted that launching such a service is “not rocket science,” and that others will likely follow suit if such a model catches on.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
- 2Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 3NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 4Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 5DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250