10 Questions to Ask Your Law Firm's Managed IT Services Provider
The managed IT services model can enable law firms to turn over the day-to-day IT infrastructure requirements to a service provider, who can do it at a lower cost and with greater efficiency.
December 10, 2018 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
Managed IT services for law firms has evolved from its early days of providing offshore support services, data center space and outsourced IT hardware. The strategy of managed IT services has now emerged as a valuable approach for law firms who choose to partner with an expert services provider.
With today's innovative model, the managed services provider assumes operational responsibility for the firm's IT systems and operations—either portions of or the entire IT function. Examples include desktop support for the firm's employees, management of the firm's network, servers, databases and applications, and monitoring and resolving IT issues.
This model enables law firms to turn over the day-to-day IT infrastructure requirements to a service provider, who can do it at a lower cost and with greater efficiency, and to redirect the time of their full-time staff members toward higher value functions that drive firms' business forward.
For instance, some firms choose to focus their staff on process innovation to find greater efficiencies in workflow. Other firms have assigned to their technology professionals the responsibility of identifying and deploying practice-specific applications that differentiate their firm from their peers, such as natural language processing, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics. Firms that employ a managed IT services provider often reinvest savings from their IT budget into new full-time positions that better align with their business strategies.
The managed IT services model also solves the problem that law firms face with attracting and retaining the top-tier IT talent necessary to build, deploy and maintain their technology infrastructure. This means that law firms can turn operational expenditures into capital expenditures, which smooths out their year-over-year investment profile and avoids the risk of a surprise capital expenditure for additional hardware necessary to keep the firm running.
If your firm has experienced these issues and is considering a move to the managed IT services model, it is important to select the right partner. In addition to obvious broad considerations, such as information security protocols and data center certifications, here are 10 specific questions to ask potential managed IT service providers before making your choice:
- How much experience and what level of partnerships do you have within the legal industry?
- Is managed IT services a primary business function of your organization?
- How do you structure your service level agreements to define the specific deliverables we will receive?
- How will your managed services team proactively monitor, identify and repair problems with our IT infrastructure?
- Do you offer on-site and/or after-hours support in the event of an emergency?
- What kind of measurement, reporting and communication do you provide?
- How will your managed services enhance innovation and collaboration efforts within our law firm?
- How rapidly does your managed services team adapt to fast-changing market trends with recommendations for new technologies to deploy, software applications to adopt or collaboration tools to implement?
- What percentage of your managed services clients are law firms and are you willing to provide client references within the legal industry?
- Can you offer strategic guidance on IT selection, deployment and our overall firm technology strategy?
Managed IT services has emerged as a key business strategy for law firms to contain operational IT costs while also improving the delivery of IT services. By partnering with an expert service provider that focuses exclusively in the legal services marketplace, law firms can spend less time and money on their IT infrastructure and leave that up to the managed IT services provider.
This is a big decision, with significant implications on the firm's operations, so it is important to ask the right questions and choose wisely.
Matt Gillis is president of HBR Consulting's IT Managed Services business. Matt has more than 30 years of experience in the legal industry, including 15 years as an executive in legal software and technology services businesses. He works with law firms, alternative legal service providers (ALSPs) and corporate legal departments on process improvement, technology and business strategy. For more information, please go to www.hbrconsulting.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 2Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 3Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 4Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
- 5Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250