Elevate Acquires Sumati Group With Aim to Develop Holistic Contract Services
Legal services and tech provider Elevate recently acquired the Sumati Group, which could bring the company a few steps closer to its goal of streamlining the contract support process.
December 11, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Legal services and tech provider Elevate announced last week that it had expanded its range of contract support capabilities with the acquisition of contract management and technology company Sumati Group.
Coming along for the ride are 20-plus contract lifecycle management (CLM) services and more than 200 Sumati lawyers and technologists to help with contract review and analysis.
“What [Summit has] been able to bring to the table from a strategic perspective is our ability to strengthen our depth and bring us capabilities in contract services as well as the technology side,” said Kunoor Chopra, Elevate's vice president of legal services.
She's noted that Sumati's capabilities in CLM and contract mitigation and diligence will help to plug a few gaps in Elevate's preexisting services. Such services, however, were recently granted an additional boost with Elevate's acquisition of the legal AI and consulting firm LexPredict.
The strategy behind Elevate's two acquisitions essentially boils down to creating a holistic, end-to-end experience where different aspects of contract services are bundled together with technology under one arm.
Pratik Patel, vice president of innovation at Elevate, thinks about it in terms of efficiency. Two minds are better than one, especially if one of those minds is a machine.
Blending Sumati's human experts with LexPredict's AI tech could help streamline time-consuming tasks like migrating thousands of contracts from one system to another or doing a large-scale search for any and all contracts related to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
“That's where the LexPredict acquisition underneath those reviewers effectively adds 40 to 50 percent efficiency in those sort of search and find contract review/contract analysis type projects,” Patel said.
Chopra compared what's happening with contracts to the kinds of developments seen in litigation after e-discovery technology came to the scene.
Back then, throwing a bunch of extra bodies at the problem wasn't a viable or cost effective solution long term, and the same logic applies here. Companies run on contracts—all of the moving parts included—and Chopra said part of Elevate's strategy has been an attempt to make that process more effective from both a people and technology standpoint.
“You're going to need humans but how can we reduce the touch points, how do we improve quality, how do we reduce risk by bringing in automation and machine learning?” Chopra said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250