Japan Looks for Private Sector Cybersecurity Help Ahead of 2020 Olympics
With a new cybersecurity minister who has admitted he doesn't know much about cybersecurity, Japan is looking to the private sector to provide some assistance in protecting the country from cyberthreats.
December 14, 2018 at 10:45 AM
3 minute read
Japan's Cybersecurity Minister Yoshitaka Sakurada grabbed global headlines after admitting he doesn't use computers. He later conceded he also doesn't know much about cybersecurity at a legislative meeting revising Japan's cybersecurity structure.
It may come as little surprise then that the Japanese government will look to enlist the private sector to help fight against cyber threats during the upcoming Tokyo Olympics, beginning in July 2020.
Earlier this month, Japan's National Diet, the country's legislative body, passed a law that allows more public and private sector stakeholder collaboration and information sharing regarding cybersecurity. Shinsuke Yakura, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's Tokyo office, said a formal council of the public and private cybersecurity sector wasn't available before.
“So far, there's no unified entity that can oversee such activity of many stakeholders,” Yakura said.
Kenji Uesugi, senior fellow of the Tokyo-based think tank Japan Cybersecurity Innovation Committee, said the heightened probability of cyberattacks during the Olympics have pushed the Japanese government to act.
“It is obvious that the Tokyo 2020 Olympics would be targeted by the cyberattackers,” Uesugi said. “The worst scenario might be serious damage to the games by cyber or physical terrorists. What is needed for Japan's anti-cyber-terrorism [to deal] with incidents by flexibly collaborating with the public and the private sectors.”
D.C.-based Paul Hastings partner Robert Silvers, who also worked in the Obama administration and negotiated cybersecurity priorities with Japan and other countries, said Japan's cybersecurity concerns with North Korea are still particularly fresh in that country's mind.
In 2014, North Korean government hackers breached Japanese-owned Sony Pictures Entertainment's employee computers and leaked numerous company emails, documents and some unreleased movies, including a comedy parodying North Korea leader Kim Jong Un.
“Obviously, Japan has a tense relationship with North Korea, and we have seen North Korea is one of the menacing actors in cybersecurity,” Silvers said. “North Korea's threats are on everyone's minds over there.”
Silvers said he expected forthcoming regulations in Japan to focus closely on internet of things and cybersecurity. He also noted it would be interesting to see if the Japanese government tightens its rules around data breach notifications.
“Traditionally I don't think there's been a strong enforcement. … It'll be interesting to see if regulators or legislators look to strengthen enforcement authorities,” Silvers added.
There are, however, some data security laws on the books in Japan. Uesugi, for instance, cited the Act on the Protection of Personal Information and the Basic Cybersecurity Act as key Japanese cybersecurity regulations companies should know.
The Act on the Protection of Personal Information concerns data privacy issues. The law also established the Personal Information Protection Commission, an independent agency whose primary responsibilities including protecting personal information and confirming compliance.
On the other hand, the Basic Cybersecurity Act describes the cybersecurity duties of state and local authorities and “critical infrastructure operators,” including information and communications technologies, finance, government and credit card services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 2Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 3Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 4Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 5Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250