Legal Tech's Predictions for 2019 in E-Discovery
The discovery process will continue to evolve next year, experts say, with an increased focus on analytics, privacy and more.
December 19, 2018 at 11:30 AM
6 minute read
Many now consider e-discovery to be a mature market, but that doesn't mean the pace of innovation is necessarily slowing down. On the contrary, 2018 saw the adoption of new technologies like beginning-of-EDRM analytics at a wider scale, a focus on expanding e-discovery technology into adjacent spaces like information governance, and the acceptance of e-discovery lexicon into the wider legal community.
Looking ahead to 2019, Legaltech News asked a number of e-discovery attorneys and experts what they see as coming next. The expectations vary widely, from an increased use of data analytics, to a focus on privacy and security, to active learning and proportionality being engaged earlier as part of the process. Below is their full thoughts, organized by last names in alphabetical order.
For 2019 predictions on cybersecurity, click here. Tomorrow, LTN will publish the final set of predictions, on innovative technologies.
|E-Discovery Predictions
Bobbi Basile, HBR Consulting: “Heretofore, the discovery industry has focused on reducing the volume of documents after collection and processing ('data minimization') the data. In 2019, the focus will shift to the gap between legal hold issuance and data collection. Earlier engagement with custodians—in a transparent, documented and substantiated way—to determine actual relevance will reduce custodians' hold, phasing and/or targeted collection efforts and may allow earlier release of some holds.”
David Carns, Casepoint: “In 2019, firms and legal departments will look for new ways to exploit the power of analytics across the entire e-discovery workflow and across multiple matters to proactively control costs, budget more accurately, litigate more efficiently and generate better legal outcomes. This will put a premium on flexible platforms that can integrate diverse applications and technologies like machine learning, predictive modeling and data visualization to quickly sort through large bodies of complex information. Lawyers will use these tools to make better strategic decisions earlier in litigation, and legal executives will use them to make dramatic improvements to workflows and operations.”
Chris Chalstrom, Shepherd Data Services: “The reason businesses are going SaaS is simple: They can move into a perfect home and not worry about leaks or cracks in the foundation. Instead, they can walk into their environment, fire up their custom programs, and have nice toasty solutions for their clients. And, they can spend more time making better solutions for clients, instead of obsessing about details clients never see.”
Kirk Chocholek, QDiscovery: “'Active learning' will be used as a supplemental tool to support traditional linear reviews. Case managers will run it in the background and use it to prioritize documents for batching or to QC the results of a linear review. This will be the first step in the adoption of active learning. As people become more familiar with it and its value is proven, it will eventually become the default.”
Brad Harris, Zapproved: “Proportionality will reign supreme in meet-and-confer discussions, driven by a never-ending escalation of costs associated with traditional approaches to discovery. Successful litigation teams will rely on solid legal hold practices and refined early case assessment to confidently limit scope for both preservation and discovery, with new tools emerging for corporate legal teams to manage control cost and mitigate risk.”
Janice Hollman, Relativity: “As law firms and corporations meet the need to create high-caliber, cross-functional teams, the opportunity for job growth and promotion for tech-savvy legal professionals will only grow. In 2019, we'll continue to see more paralegals and litigation support professionals getting certified—along with increased demand for tech-trained paralegals and lawyers.”
Maureen O'Neill, Consilio: “2019 will be a tipping point for the protection of personal data privacy in legal discovery. We're already seeing some impact from Europe's GDPR, as litigants realize that discovery in their U.S. matters may include EU personal data. But now every state has a data breach regulation, California has passed sweeping privacy legislation, and we're seeing a groundswell of support for a comprehensive federal privacy law—among industry leaders as well as regulators. Going forward, lawyers and their clients will be forced to adjust their e-discovery strategies and workflows to incorporate personal data privacy protection.”
Anthony Petruzzi, Adrienne Kirshner and Stephanie Rzepka, Tucker Ellis: “We expect to see the threat of ESI platform data breaches move to the forefront in 2019. ESI platforms offer sophisticated hackers means, motive, and opportunity because the platforms store concentrated sensitive information that must be accessible from multiple points and devices. Furthermore, the risk of a breach heightens during transfers, but the discovery process necessitates that ESI be transferred from the proprietor to an ESI vendor and then legal counsel. We predict that law firms and vendors will turn their attention to ensuring that they are not the weak link in this chain.”
Bill Piwonka, Exterro: “E-Discovery technology vendors are going to embrace Microsoft Office 365's capabilities. Microsoft has had great success driving the adoption of Office 365, and while they continue to add e-discovery features into their offering, traditional e-discovery vendors will embrace Office 365 to deliver new, compelling solutions that complement Microsoft Office's functionality and help legal professionals get to the facts of a matter more quickly, less expensively, and defensibly.”
Michael Swarz, Veritone: “2019 will be the year demand for translation of any ESI file—text, audio and video—will balloon to meet increasingly globalized e-discovery & compliance requirements. Firms will look for robust translation options, whether machine or human, to translate international files into the language of their choice—by location, accent and dataset—to win their case.”
Lon Troyer, H5: “The legal realm isn't exactly known for its speedy embrace of technology-driven solutions in e-discovery, but the growing cultural acceptance of AI and data analytics in everyday life is bound to push the needle forward. The variety and proliferation of analytics tools and expertise available to find critical information in large datasets more quickly and efficiently will drive forward-thinking lawyers and their clients to pursue e-discovery as a targeted fact-finding exercise, rather than a massive manual review effort. Look for more collaboration among lawyers and search experts, especially in high stakes practice areas such as white collar and antitrust, cybersecurity, and investigations.”
James Whittington, GravityStack: “The introduction of a mandatory two-year disclosure pilot scheme in the UK Business and Property Courts from January 2019 will produce significant change that will require parties to conduct e-discovery at a much earlier stage. Parties must complete a 'Disclosure Review Document' that includes agreement on the use of analytics and TAR. The disclosure reform aims to reduce the cost, scope and complexity of e-discovery.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 2Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 3Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 4When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250