North Carolina State Bar Launches Privacy Certification Amid Growing Cyber Focus
The North Carolina State Bar recently founded a privacy and information security law certification. In the absence of a federal privacy law, such certifications could become common in other states.
December 21, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Right now there's more supply than demand when it comes to lawyers who know their way around privacy and information security. But companies and firms have demonstrated a preference for lawyers brandishing certification, such as those from the globally focused International Association of Privacy Professionals.
That's one part of the reason the North Carolina State Bar recently became one of the first bar associations in the country to offer a certification in privacy and information security law.
The other part is the notion that with the absence of a federal privacy standard in America, attorneys looking to make a name for themselves could do well to focus on regulations governing their state of practice.
“Understanding federal law or the general trend among states is important and that is a component of our criteria in North Carolina because we require that people pass that Certified Information Privacy Professional, U.S. exam,” said Matt Cordell, chair of the North Carolina State Bar's privacy and information specialization committee. “But if you don't know the nuances in your state you probably shouldn't be holding yourself out as a specialist in that state.”
North Carolina's specialization requires that applicants have averaged at least 300 hours of practice a year in the privacy and information security field, so it's definitely not a “privacy for novices “ course. Instead Cordell is hoping to attract attorneys who are looking to distinguish themselves from the competition.
Applicants have to complete a rigorous two-part exam that features every statute and law related to privacy and information security that Cordell and his committee could find, especially those in North Carolina. He expects to see the certification become more popular as domestic law firms start to feel the pinch to become full-service agencies and attempt to catch up with the more robust operations already established in Europe.
“The practice area keeps growing. It seems like every month I get an email alert from one of the law firms, whether it's state or regional or national law firms,” Cordell said.
TRU Staffing Partners, a contract staffing and executive placement firm operating in New York City, just recently expanded its cybersecurity and e-discovery focus to include privacy.
Founder and CEO Jared Coseglia expects that 2019 will see a hiring surge in positions such as privacy programming managers, senior associates, privacy consultants and privacy coordinators for corporations. He thinks that there could not be a better time for attorneys looking to transition into the field.
“Within the four months we've probably picked up to 50 privacy attorney positions at the senior associate and partner level. Those positions are very difficult to fill specifically because there's not the breadth of talent available and a lot of that talent has grown up inside corporations, which doesn't necessarily have the same skillset that's needed for law firms,” Coseglia said.
He doesn't expect for their to be a unified federal privacy standard in America anytime soon, further increasing the burden on job-seeking lawyers who have to become familiar with a patchwork of different state regulations. That's where Cordell expects other state bar associations to follow North Carolina's lead.
“I think other states may follow that course. They may decide that it's worthwhile to have a specialization that includes a component of state law distinctions,” Cordell said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250