The Posts that Matter: Courts Stress Relevance in Social Media Discovery
Recent rulings highlight how relevance is key when asking courts to grant access to private social media posts.
December 26, 2018 at 02:49 PM
3 minute read
At a Dec. 19 webinar assembled by Hanzo, a data collection and archiving technology provider, legal technology and in-house professionals discussed the use of social media in litigation, compliance and investigations. The panelists noted that courts have approached the discovery of social media by stressing the need to assess posts' relevance on a case-by-case basis.
When conducting an internal investigation of an employee, the freedom to investigate his or her social media is nearly unlimited, so long as the postings are made through the company's server, said DHL Supply Chain Americas general counsel Mark Smolik.
But when investigating an outside matter, it's a different story. “The rules of evidence in most courts, particularly in the United States, they haven't changed,” Smolik said. “They have never been adapted to specifically reflect digitized discovery or social media.”
Panelists in the webinar noted that the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada ruling in Hinostroza v. Denny's, especially its use of the “scorched Earth” term in reference to social media, serves as a potential bellwether to how to approach social media discovery.
Hanzo senior account executive Evan Gumz explained that in Denny's, the court ruled that social media is discoverable but proportionality matters under the same federal rule of civil procedure standard that is used for assessing discovery of paper documents.
“Quite candidly, I think the court would have come out with the same conclusion even if we didn't have digitized discovery because the scorched earth reference has been used for years in the courts,” Smolik said. Nonetheless, he said it was nice to see the court present that guidance.
Gumz also cited the New York State Court of Appeals decision in Forman v. Henkin, which held private posts on Facebook aren't entitled to any special protection based on the user's privacy settings, as another significant guideline for social media discovery.
The New York court said social media posts set for private viewing would be discoverable if they are “material and necessary to the prosecution or defense of an action,” Gumz said.
As social media, and the massive trove of data it can provide, becomes a mainstay in discovery, Smolik advised lawyers to take a proactive and unified approach when searching social media for discovery. He suggested defining what the team is looking for beforehand. Such an approach, he said, leads to better use of resources and expenses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250