The Posts that Matter: Courts Stress Relevance in Social Media Discovery
Recent rulings highlight how relevance is key when asking courts to grant access to private social media posts.
December 26, 2018 at 02:49 PM
3 minute read
At a Dec. 19 webinar assembled by Hanzo, a data collection and archiving technology provider, legal technology and in-house professionals discussed the use of social media in litigation, compliance and investigations. The panelists noted that courts have approached the discovery of social media by stressing the need to assess posts' relevance on a case-by-case basis.
When conducting an internal investigation of an employee, the freedom to investigate his or her social media is nearly unlimited, so long as the postings are made through the company's server, said DHL Supply Chain Americas general counsel Mark Smolik.
But when investigating an outside matter, it's a different story. “The rules of evidence in most courts, particularly in the United States, they haven't changed,” Smolik said. “They have never been adapted to specifically reflect digitized discovery or social media.”
Panelists in the webinar noted that the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada ruling in Hinostroza v. Denny's, especially its use of the “scorched Earth” term in reference to social media, serves as a potential bellwether to how to approach social media discovery.
Hanzo senior account executive Evan Gumz explained that in Denny's, the court ruled that social media is discoverable but proportionality matters under the same federal rule of civil procedure standard that is used for assessing discovery of paper documents.
“Quite candidly, I think the court would have come out with the same conclusion even if we didn't have digitized discovery because the scorched earth reference has been used for years in the courts,” Smolik said. Nonetheless, he said it was nice to see the court present that guidance.
Gumz also cited the New York State Court of Appeals decision in Forman v. Henkin, which held private posts on Facebook aren't entitled to any special protection based on the user's privacy settings, as another significant guideline for social media discovery.
The New York court said social media posts set for private viewing would be discoverable if they are “material and necessary to the prosecution or defense of an action,” Gumz said.
As social media, and the massive trove of data it can provide, becomes a mainstay in discovery, Smolik advised lawyers to take a proactive and unified approach when searching social media for discovery. He suggested defining what the team is looking for beforehand. Such an approach, he said, leads to better use of resources and expenses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250