5 Cybersecurity Habits Law Firms Should Kick in 2019
As 2018 comes to a close, here are a few cybersecurity habits law firms shouldn't bring in the new year.
December 27, 2018 at 01:27 PM
3 minute read
With 2019 just a few days away, lawyers and their firms should make a few cybersecurity-specific New Year's resolutions.
From allowing “security exceptions” for high-ranking attorneys to lawyers sending unencrypted confidential documents, cybersecurity professionals revealed the common cybersecurity missteps law firms should commit to fixing. Here's the top five:
|Phone Scams
Experian data breach resolution group and consumer protection vice president Michael Bruemmer said lawyers can fall victim to phone scams, where cyberatrackers call an unsuspecting attorney and use their simple answer to a seemingly innocuous question as a “voice print” to later authorize money transfers or access client information.
Bruemmer said the phone scams are in higher use during the holidays and after natural disasters.
“Hackers are using anything they can, and phone scams are being used right now, because phone numbers are one of the easiest data [points] to obtain,” Bruemmer explained.
|'Security Exceptions'
PeopleSec CEO Joshua Crumbaugh said the hierarchy of law firms allows high-ranking lawyers to bypass firmwide requirements for tougher passwords, leading to weaker passwords protecting sensitive information.
Such preferential treatment, Crumbaugh added, could also lead to passwords and access being given over the phone to bad actors imitating a partner making demands to lower-ranking staff.
|Encryption Versus Convenience
David Lipscomb, an IT professional and president of BDPA Philadelphia, the Philadelphia chapter of an organization that seeks to connect diverse IT professionals to development programs, said he sees some small law firms not using systems to automatically encrypt emails.
Lipscomb said it's highly recommended that confidential information be sent encrypted, although not all lawyers follow such practice.
|Reusing Passwords
Charles Carmakal of cybersecurity enterprise FireEye Inc. said law firms typically reuse passwords. He recommended lawyers and law firms implement multifactor authentication and use different passwords for every device and software.
|Network Security
For Nadav Arbel, founder and CEO of CyberHat, protecting and monitoring a law firm's networks are key in fending off cybersecurity exploitation.
“Depending on where the data is stored, backed up or copied, it can be difficult to tell who has access to it,” Arbel wrote in an email. “Ensuring a 'network aware' IT environment, in which the security of the network is being consistently monitored for breaches … is the best method for protecting law firms and their clientele from hackers looking to exploit personal information.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 2'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 3Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 4These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 5'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250