Connected Cars Are Picking Up More Personal Information Without Slowing Down
As connected cars continue to become smarter, protecting drivers' personal information might become more difficult as vehicles are able to absorb more information than ever before.
December 27, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Ignorance is bliss—but try telling that to the auto industry. According to a connected cars and autonomous vehicles survey published by the firm of Foley and Lardner in 2017, more than 70 million connected cars will be driving the roads come 2023.
Connected cars utilize an array of sensors. They know how much gas you're using, where you stop on the way to work each day or if you're prone to breaking the speed limit getting there. It's a treasure trove of information that can be incredibly useful to auto manufacturers looking to develop the next generation of artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicles.
But sorting out exactly to whom that data belongs, however, is a task that promises to become more complex as cars become smarter.
“The data is crucial for developing artificial intelligence to advance vehicles. But, at the same time, as the consumer, I'm very concerned about the data that's going to be collected for my particular driving,” said Linda Rhodes, a partner specializing in complex commercial transactions at Mayer Brown.
As a link in the Internet of Things, connected cars would technically fall under the purview of the FTC but aren't specifically addressed by any one regulation. However, the Self Drive Act—which would establish a federal role in ensuring the safety of highly automated vehicles and require manufacturers to establish written cybersecurity plans—passed the U.S. House of Representatives in September 2017 and is being reviewed by the U.S. Senate. Still, experts say this legislation won't address the privacy issues raised by smart cars.
“I think that there's a lot of work to be done before you have specific legislation that's directed at privacy in cars, but you've got a lot of guidance and bills and principles and discussion going on about the importance of data privacy as it relates to connected vehicles,” Rhodes said.
Fortunately, most auto companies are probably not interested in how often you visit the Walmart. Manufacturers are after driver reaction data—how smoothly you merge onto a highway, for example.
“That information may be helpful in terms of the artificial intelligence needed to drive the vehicles but it may it may also be unique to the driver in the sense that an insurance company might be interested in that data because how the driver is driving might influence how you set insurance rates for a driver,” Rhodes said.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers—an organization that consists of industry mainstays such as BMW, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors—implemented its own set of consumer privacy principles that would prohibit that car companies from sharing information such as vehicle speed or seat belt use.
But the degree of personal information at stake could potentially become more sensitive. Volvo and Ericsson have already announced an intention to begin developing entertainment systems for autonomous cars that would allow users to stream their favorite movies or television series. There also are apps on the market that allow users to pay for their gas via their cars.
All of this has Rhodes predicting an interesting future. “You may be able to hold a conference call in your vehicle once it's fully autonomous. You [also] may be able to use your vehicle as payment system if you were to download a movie on Netflix.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250