Connected Cars Are Picking Up More Personal Information Without Slowing Down
As connected cars continue to become smarter, protecting drivers' personal information might become more difficult as vehicles are able to absorb more information than ever before.
December 27, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Ignorance is bliss—but try telling that to the auto industry. According to a connected cars and autonomous vehicles survey published by the firm of Foley and Lardner in 2017, more than 70 million connected cars will be driving the roads come 2023.
Connected cars utilize an array of sensors. They know how much gas you're using, where you stop on the way to work each day or if you're prone to breaking the speed limit getting there. It's a treasure trove of information that can be incredibly useful to auto manufacturers looking to develop the next generation of artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicles.
But sorting out exactly to whom that data belongs, however, is a task that promises to become more complex as cars become smarter.
“The data is crucial for developing artificial intelligence to advance vehicles. But, at the same time, as the consumer, I'm very concerned about the data that's going to be collected for my particular driving,” said Linda Rhodes, a partner specializing in complex commercial transactions at Mayer Brown.
As a link in the Internet of Things, connected cars would technically fall under the purview of the FTC but aren't specifically addressed by any one regulation. However, the Self Drive Act—which would establish a federal role in ensuring the safety of highly automated vehicles and require manufacturers to establish written cybersecurity plans—passed the U.S. House of Representatives in September 2017 and is being reviewed by the U.S. Senate. Still, experts say this legislation won't address the privacy issues raised by smart cars.
“I think that there's a lot of work to be done before you have specific legislation that's directed at privacy in cars, but you've got a lot of guidance and bills and principles and discussion going on about the importance of data privacy as it relates to connected vehicles,” Rhodes said.
Fortunately, most auto companies are probably not interested in how often you visit the Walmart. Manufacturers are after driver reaction data—how smoothly you merge onto a highway, for example.
“That information may be helpful in terms of the artificial intelligence needed to drive the vehicles but it may it may also be unique to the driver in the sense that an insurance company might be interested in that data because how the driver is driving might influence how you set insurance rates for a driver,” Rhodes said.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers—an organization that consists of industry mainstays such as BMW, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors—implemented its own set of consumer privacy principles that would prohibit that car companies from sharing information such as vehicle speed or seat belt use.
But the degree of personal information at stake could potentially become more sensitive. Volvo and Ericsson have already announced an intention to begin developing entertainment systems for autonomous cars that would allow users to stream their favorite movies or television series. There also are apps on the market that allow users to pay for their gas via their cars.
All of this has Rhodes predicting an interesting future. “You may be able to hold a conference call in your vehicle once it's fully autonomous. You [also] may be able to use your vehicle as payment system if you were to download a movie on Netflix.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250