Neiman Marcus to Pay $1.5M to End Data Breach Probe
Connecticut co-led the multistate investigation with the Illinois Attorney General's Office. Several state attorneys general applauded the settlement Tuesday.
January 09, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Neiman Marcus has agreed to pay $1.5 million to 43 states and the District of Columbia, as well as set up new security procedures, to end an investigation into the 2013 breach of customer payment card data at 77 U.S. stores, attorneys general across the country announced Tuesday.
Texas-based Neiman Marcus disclosed the data breach in January 2014, saying payment card information at certain stores had been compromised by an unknown third party. The states' investigation determined that approximately 370,000 payment cards were involved, and at least 9,200 of the total payment cards compromised in the breach were used fraudulently, according to the attorneys general.
In addition to the money, Neiman Marcus has agreed to a series of changes intended to prevent similar breaches in the future. Those include working agreements with two separate forensic investors, updating all software involved in payments, reviewing industry-accepted technologies and encrypting payment card information.
Asked for comment on the settlement, the company sent this statement: “We are pleased this matter is now resolved.”
“Retailers have a responsibility under Connecticut law to keep consumer information safe and to make accurate representations to consumers through their privacy policies about the security of the personal information they collect,” Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, whose office took a lead role in the matter, said in a news release Tuesday. “All retailers need to take this responsibility seriously.”
State Department of Consumer Protection Commissioner Michelle Seagull joined in Jepsen's announcement. “While consumers need to work harder than they've had to in the past to keep their information safe, businesses also need to play a role,” Seagull said. “Businesses have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their customers' information by maintaining and improving their security systems.”
Connecticut co-led the multijurisdiction investigation along with the Illinois Attorney General's Office, and Connecticut's share of the settlement funds is $102,574.09, which is to be deposited in the state's General Fund, Jepson said.
Several other state attorneys general applauded the settlement Tuesday.
“When a retailer collects and retains credit card information, they owe a duty to their customers,” Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said in a news release Tuesday. “We will remain vigilant in working with public and private sector partners to protect Georgia consumers and their personal information.”
“New Yorkers deserve to shop with confidence, which includes trusting that their personal information will be protected,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a news release. “With the monetary settlement and the implementation of several new data security policies, this marks a significant win for those who shop in New York. This office will continue its commitment to combat inadequate data security in the state of New York.”
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said his state law requires businesses to “maintain reasonable safeguards against cyberattacks to protect consumers' personal information from unlawful use or disclosure.” Paxton added, “I urge companies to evaluate whether they have in place a thorough and ongoing written information security program that serves to safeguard their customers' information.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250