ABA Survey: Only 10 Percent of Law Firms Are Currently Using AI
The American Bar Association's report found AI usage is greater among large firms, while smaller firms saw uncertainty over what benefits AI offers law.
January 11, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
The use of AI in legal may not be as widespread as one would think: Only 10 percent of lawyers used artificial intelligence-based tech tools for their legal work in 2018.
The findings come from a survey conducted in the ABA's “2018 Legal Technology Survey Report,” with 900 respondents from across the nation and at firms of various sizes.
While only 10 percent of respondents reported they used artificial intelligence-based technology tools, respondents at large law firms with over 100 attorneys were most likely to use the technology (26 percent). Specifically, 35 percent of respondents from large firms with 500-plus attorneys reported they used AI, compared to 23 percent of respondents at firms with 100-499 attorneys.
Alternatively, respondents at firms with a 50-99 headcount were the least likely to use AI (three percent), followed by four percent of respondents at firms that employ two to nine attorneys. Eight percent of solo practitioner respondents said they used AI, along with nearly 12 percent of attorneys at firms with 10-49 attorneys.
Nearly half, 45 percent, of respondents said they weren't interested in purchasing AI-based tech tools. While only three percent of respondents at 100-plus lawyer firms responded as such, over half of solo lawyers (65 percent) and lawyers at boutiques (60 percent) said they had no interest in purchasing an AI-based software.
Meanwhile, only eight percent of respondents said they were “seriously considering” purchasing AI software tools. Respondents at firms with 100 or more attorneys were most likely (16 percent) to report they were considering an AI purchase, according to the report.
The lack of interest in AI among smaller firms may stem from uncertainty about artificial intelligence's possible benefits.
For instance, 41 percent of all respondents said they didn't know the most important benefit AI-based tech tools could provide their firms. Only 27 percent of respondents from firms with 100-plus attorneys shared that sentiment, while at least 40 percent of firms with less than 49 attorneys also said they didn't know any AI benefits.
For those that saw a benefit in AI, saving time/increasing efficiency was the highest-rated advantage that AI-powered software could provide, according to the report.
In addition, document review and document management was cited by nearly one-fourth of respondents as an important benefit (25 percent), followed by reducing costs and predicting outcomes/reducing risk.
At 44 percent, cost and accuracy of technology were the top two concerns for implementing AI, followed closely by technology's reliability (42 percent), according to the ABA.
Interestingly, 61 percent of respondents at Big Law (firms that employ 500-plus attorneys) cited accuracy of technology as their biggest concern about AI, the only response to receive a consensus of over 50 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250