CIOs Look to Tech Skills to Sustain Legal Industry
A panel of chief innovation officers at this year's Legalweek will offer insight into their duties and how they find success in their new titles in an evolving legal industry.
January 16, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
The chief innovation officer position has varying duties based on a company's or law firm's needs, but CIOs say one of the position's biggest roles is ensuring lawyers aren't left behind in a technologically advancing and diversifying world.
Two current CIOs and a legal technology manager are scheduled to speak during "Innovative Law Departments: New Roles Highlight the Importance of Innovation in Law Departments," a Legalweek panel Jan. 30. The trio will discuss what their individual duties are and how they measure their role's success in the hype-filled realm of "innovation."
The speakers include: Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc. chief legal innovation counsel Farrah Pepper; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe chief legal innovation officer Wendy Curtis; and Amy Hinzmann, Consilio LLC client experience officer.
As the CIO position is relatively new in the in-house legal department and outside counsel world, their duties vary. For instance, some CIOs focus on generating revenue, while others do not.
To Pepper, the nascent role commonly entails, among other things, keeping or setting the pace of transformation in the legal industry; creating innovation incubators; implementing technology, especially artificial intelligence; and using AI to inform business decisions. Pepper added that CIOs launch innovative processes and implement and evaluate their effectiveness.
"[The chief legal innovation counsel's] acronym is 'CLIC,' so when people ask what I do, I make things click," Pepper explained. "The CLIC has to move the needle. … The CLIC matches up with what the law firms are doing, establishing R&D incubators, jump-starting cultural change [and] designing and aligning change to corporate structure."
While innovation and AI may be seen as empty words by some, for Pepper, such innovation must lead to tangible results.
"If it's not driving value or happiness or monetary outcomes, you have to revisit why are we doing it this way," she added.
Innovation has also lead to an increase of non-lawyer hiring in legal, as lawyers use alternative measures to leverage their trove of data for clients.
"When you go to tackle a problem, the more experience and talent you bring the better the outcome," said Curtis.
Likewise, e-discovery has been a springboard for innovative and diverse non-lawyer skill sets, the CIOs noted.
"E-discovery has really been the innovation hub or lab for a lot of these technologies that we see applied in a lot of legal work," Curtis said. "I think the e-discovery workflow will drive change and be an example of how this [innovation] could work."
To Hinzmann, e-discovery is constantly advancing because of the amount of data it entails and making it cost-effective for clients is paramount. "If we aren't innovating in e-discovery you are dying," she said.
For the panel speakers, innovation isn't just hype. Instead, it represents a proactive stance in a transforming legal industry.
"This culture shift is an unstoppable wave at this point," Pepper explained. "For folks that may be retiring in the next year, maybe they can get by with doing what they have already done, but everyone else better grab their surfboards."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250