Lawclerk's New Move: Enable 'Small Law' With Network of Freelance Associates
With its new Teams function, Lawclerk allows its small and solo law firm users to build trusted groups of freelance associates, all while setting itself up to potentially move into the corporate law market.
January 17, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
The gig economy potentially just got a boost from one of its newest advocates. On-demand legal service provider Lawclerk has announced the official launch of a new service called “Teams,” which it hopes will allow law firms to build trusted networks of freelance attorneys to work with on an ongoing basis.
Talitha Kozlowski, co-founder of Lawclerk and partner at Las Vegas-based Garman Turner Gordon, said Teams is a way for small and solo law firms “to access a variety of legal talent. … You can build your own virtual team of associates and expand as much as you want.”
The new service essentially allows Lawclerk users to save freelance attorneys to a team that can be categorized by practice area or project. Whereas before Lawclerk users had to post projects to the service's marketplace in order to find freelance attorneys, Teams allows them to directly access the profile, including the peer reviews, of such attorneys without first assigning work.
While Teams officially launched today, it had a limited soft launch in October, though users were only able to create one team instead of an unlimited amount that could make up a network of outside legal help.
With the introduction of the full Teams functionality, Lawclerk hopes to foster trusted, mutually beneficial relationships between small law firms and freelance attorneys.
Kristin Tyler, co-founder of Lawclerk and partner at Garman Turner Gordon, noted that since “freelancers can be on multiple teams for multiple attorneys, we do have a number of freelancers that say this is their full-time gig now.”
Likewise, Tyler added that, for small and solo firms, the ability to periodically hire trusted freelance attorneys when demand for work is high can be a more cost-effective option than bringing on full-time associates. “With small law moreso than with larger firms, it's an ebb and flow of work. … If you're in [a slow time] and if you still have associates to pay, it's a stress on a small firm.”
And if a firm ever realizes it needs full-time attorneys to join its staff, it can directly hire the freelancers it works with through Lawclerk. Tyler noted that this has happened twice before. “Both times it was a solo attorney, and they used [Teams] to figure out if they were ready to hire an associate,” she said, adding that “as of now, we don't have anything in our terms of service to prohibit that.”
While Teams is focused on helping small and solo law firms, Tyler and Kozlowski said it was built with an eye toward serving corporate in-house attorneys in the future. However, they did not publicly announce what such an evolution could look like or when it would be released. Lawclerk's current focus is primarily on small and solo law firms.
To be sure, Lawclerk is just one of many legal service providers looking to support freelance hiring in the legal market. Companies such as LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer and InCloudCounsel also are fueling the rise of a gig economy for attorneys.
The proliferation of companies in this market, however, isn't deterring relatively new companies like Lawclerk. In fact, it's encouraging them. “We welcome the competition right now.” Tyler said. “I think it validates the model; it shows the important way the industry is changing to incorporate gig and freelance work. Each of us have a little different model, and it's a huge market.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250