Lawclerk's New Move: Enable 'Small Law' With Network of Freelance Associates
With its new Teams function, Lawclerk allows its small and solo law firm users to build trusted groups of freelance associates, all while setting itself up to potentially move into the corporate law market.
January 17, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
The gig economy potentially just got a boost from one of its newest advocates. On-demand legal service provider Lawclerk has announced the official launch of a new service called “Teams,” which it hopes will allow law firms to build trusted networks of freelance attorneys to work with on an ongoing basis.
Talitha Kozlowski, co-founder of Lawclerk and partner at Las Vegas-based Garman Turner Gordon, said Teams is a way for small and solo law firms “to access a variety of legal talent. … You can build your own virtual team of associates and expand as much as you want.”
The new service essentially allows Lawclerk users to save freelance attorneys to a team that can be categorized by practice area or project. Whereas before Lawclerk users had to post projects to the service's marketplace in order to find freelance attorneys, Teams allows them to directly access the profile, including the peer reviews, of such attorneys without first assigning work.
While Teams officially launched today, it had a limited soft launch in October, though users were only able to create one team instead of an unlimited amount that could make up a network of outside legal help.
With the introduction of the full Teams functionality, Lawclerk hopes to foster trusted, mutually beneficial relationships between small law firms and freelance attorneys.
Kristin Tyler, co-founder of Lawclerk and partner at Garman Turner Gordon, noted that since “freelancers can be on multiple teams for multiple attorneys, we do have a number of freelancers that say this is their full-time gig now.”
Likewise, Tyler added that, for small and solo firms, the ability to periodically hire trusted freelance attorneys when demand for work is high can be a more cost-effective option than bringing on full-time associates. “With small law moreso than with larger firms, it's an ebb and flow of work. … If you're in [a slow time] and if you still have associates to pay, it's a stress on a small firm.”
And if a firm ever realizes it needs full-time attorneys to join its staff, it can directly hire the freelancers it works with through Lawclerk. Tyler noted that this has happened twice before. “Both times it was a solo attorney, and they used [Teams] to figure out if they were ready to hire an associate,” she said, adding that “as of now, we don't have anything in our terms of service to prohibit that.”
While Teams is focused on helping small and solo law firms, Tyler and Kozlowski said it was built with an eye toward serving corporate in-house attorneys in the future. However, they did not publicly announce what such an evolution could look like or when it would be released. Lawclerk's current focus is primarily on small and solo law firms.
To be sure, Lawclerk is just one of many legal service providers looking to support freelance hiring in the legal market. Companies such as LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer and InCloudCounsel also are fueling the rise of a gig economy for attorneys.
The proliferation of companies in this market, however, isn't deterring relatively new companies like Lawclerk. In fact, it's encouraging them. “We welcome the competition right now.” Tyler said. “I think it validates the model; it shows the important way the industry is changing to incorporate gig and freelance work. Each of us have a little different model, and it's a huge market.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250