Integrating New Tech Without Old Headaches Is Easier Said Than Done
The "Technology Adoption Done Right" panel at Legalweek 2019 will explore how firms can better implement emerging technologies throughout their practice from the conceptual stage through engaging employees in a new workflow.
January 18, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
If there's a conflict that prevents you from attending this year's "Technology Adoption Done Right" panel at the Legaltech conference during Legalweek, don't worry, because moderator Brad Blickstein seems pretty confident you'll have other chances.
"I think this will still be a topic at Legaltech 2119, to be honest with you," said Blickstein, a principal at The Blickstein Group, a consulting and managed services firm.
But from 1-2 p.m. on Jan. 29, he'll be the guy firing a bunch of questions about how workplaces can successfully adopt tech at a lineup of panelists inside the New York Hilton Midtown.
Blickstein will be joined by speakers Monet Fauntleroy, a senior manager of practice and innovation at White & Case; David Cambria, global director of operations at Baker McKenzie; and Brad Rogers, managing director and chief of staff/COO at the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America-College Retirement Equities Fund.
"Getting technology adopted is a change management project, and both in-house and outside these are some of the leading change managers in the legal industry," Blickstein said.
Fauntleroy believes that the panel can provide a nice counterbalance to the array of shiny new products that will be on display throughout the Legalweek conference. Early tech adopters can sometimes get swept away by the desire to remain on the cutting edge, focusing on the bells and whistles instead of the function that's being performed.
It's like buying a new piece of furniture that doesn't quite mesh with your pre-existing décor—or in some cases, can't even fit through the door.
"While it's great to have a convention centered around the product and what's the latest and greatest thing, it's also great in parallel to have conversations about what it means when you have it within your ecosystem and how to make it work and how to make it successful," Fauntleroy said.
The panel discussion will be conducted in a roundtable fashion with audience members encouraged to share questions or opinions. Topics on the docket include locating the motivating forces inside an organization that can drive change and how strong leadership at the top is essential to facilitating a smooth transition from one workflow to another.
Plus, there's also the small matter of a company's employees, a not inconsiderable portion of which might be reticent to abandon the pre-existing order of doing things in favor of a new approach that has yet to be drilled into habit.
"There's always people out there that don't want to use new tools or don't want to do new things, or in the case of law firms, maybe aren't properly incentivized to become more efficient. So how do you overcome those things?" Blickstein asked.
Fauntleroy would like to find an opportunity to discuss how legal tech developers can better help consumers—or more accurately, how consumers can help legal tech developers better help consumers.
With companies putting the bulk of their efforts into developing the actual technology at play, feedback from the attorneys or firms actually dealing with the logistical hurdles of implementing those products can pay dividends for both sides of the equation.
"They're not going to understand that unless we're more vocal about what our needs are, and hopefully they take that feedback and understand how to grow that aspect of their business as much as they grow the future development," Fauntleroy said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250