Integrating New Tech Without Old Headaches Is Easier Said Than Done
The "Technology Adoption Done Right" panel at Legalweek 2019 will explore how firms can better implement emerging technologies throughout their practice from the conceptual stage through engaging employees in a new workflow.
January 18, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
If there's a conflict that prevents you from attending this year's "Technology Adoption Done Right" panel at the Legaltech conference during Legalweek, don't worry, because moderator Brad Blickstein seems pretty confident you'll have other chances.
"I think this will still be a topic at Legaltech 2119, to be honest with you," said Blickstein, a principal at The Blickstein Group, a consulting and managed services firm.
But from 1-2 p.m. on Jan. 29, he'll be the guy firing a bunch of questions about how workplaces can successfully adopt tech at a lineup of panelists inside the New York Hilton Midtown.
Blickstein will be joined by speakers Monet Fauntleroy, a senior manager of practice and innovation at White & Case; David Cambria, global director of operations at Baker McKenzie; and Brad Rogers, managing director and chief of staff/COO at the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America-College Retirement Equities Fund.
"Getting technology adopted is a change management project, and both in-house and outside these are some of the leading change managers in the legal industry," Blickstein said.
Fauntleroy believes that the panel can provide a nice counterbalance to the array of shiny new products that will be on display throughout the Legalweek conference. Early tech adopters can sometimes get swept away by the desire to remain on the cutting edge, focusing on the bells and whistles instead of the function that's being performed.
It's like buying a new piece of furniture that doesn't quite mesh with your pre-existing décor—or in some cases, can't even fit through the door.
"While it's great to have a convention centered around the product and what's the latest and greatest thing, it's also great in parallel to have conversations about what it means when you have it within your ecosystem and how to make it work and how to make it successful," Fauntleroy said.
The panel discussion will be conducted in a roundtable fashion with audience members encouraged to share questions or opinions. Topics on the docket include locating the motivating forces inside an organization that can drive change and how strong leadership at the top is essential to facilitating a smooth transition from one workflow to another.
Plus, there's also the small matter of a company's employees, a not inconsiderable portion of which might be reticent to abandon the pre-existing order of doing things in favor of a new approach that has yet to be drilled into habit.
"There's always people out there that don't want to use new tools or don't want to do new things, or in the case of law firms, maybe aren't properly incentivized to become more efficient. So how do you overcome those things?" Blickstein asked.
Fauntleroy would like to find an opportunity to discuss how legal tech developers can better help consumers—or more accurately, how consumers can help legal tech developers better help consumers.
With companies putting the bulk of their efforts into developing the actual technology at play, feedback from the attorneys or firms actually dealing with the logistical hurdles of implementing those products can pay dividends for both sides of the equation.
"They're not going to understand that unless we're more vocal about what our needs are, and hopefully they take that feedback and understand how to grow that aspect of their business as much as they grow the future development," Fauntleroy said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250