Young Chicago Firm Latest to Launch Legal Tech Subsidiary
Chicago-based firm Actuate Law LLC spun-off a new legal tech subsidiary this week that will develop AI tools that automate compliance. Potential customers range from existing clients to other law firms.
January 24, 2019 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
There's a chance that Actuate Law LLC may be getting a little ahead of its self—and that's sort of the point. Less than a year after opening its doors in Chicago, the 11-lawyer boutique firm is spinning off a new legal technology advisory company.
The firm's new subsidiary Quointec LLC will leverage artificial intelligence (AI) technology to build tools that automate the completion of simple legal and compliance tasks. Where the products go from there is anybody's guess.
“We can own it and license it. We can build it and sell it. We can build it for somebody else,” said Actuate partner Martin Tully.
Tully was part of the drafting team behind the Sedona Principles, a set of e-discovery guidelines that while non-binding, are widely accepted by judges. His outlook on Quointec is really pretty simple. Somebody is going to pursue advancements in legal compliance. So why not at least try to get out in front of it?
Plans for a legal tech subsidiary have been in the works since the Actuate's earliest days. Tully sees it more as an essential component of their business model than an optional attachment.
“Clearly this is where things are going, and you either get on this train and steer it or you're going to get run over by it. And it may not be tomorrow or five years from now but long-term, I think this is where our entire profession needs to go,” said Tully.
But go where, exactly? The terrain that Quointec looks to occupy is wide and varied. Yes, many of the tools will be aimed at simplifying compliance issues having to do with records management or navigating the likes of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But how those solutions originate or are put to use is open to discussion.
Tully sees Quointec developing products to client specifications for use in-house or developing solutions for other law firms. There's even been some interest from groups dealing with compliance issues outside of the influence of the legal industry.
“We found that there are some industries that want to work with us to build a tool that will help them deal with compliance issues where more than one entity will participate in that project, because it's not a competitive issue. Compliance isn't competitive. Everyone's got to do it,” Tully said.
For Actuate it's not so much about diversifying the firm's business as it is about making sure that the business itself is still around in the years to come. Automating simple compliance procedures frees up essential personnel in the firm to devote more attention to cases requiring human insight.
“I think that [for] law firms to survive into the next generation they have to embrace and start doing stuff like this or they won't survive into the next generation,” Tully said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250