Young Chicago Firm Latest to Launch Legal Tech Subsidiary
Chicago-based firm Actuate Law LLC spun-off a new legal tech subsidiary this week that will develop AI tools that automate compliance. Potential customers range from existing clients to other law firms.
January 24, 2019 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
There's a chance that Actuate Law LLC may be getting a little ahead of its self—and that's sort of the point. Less than a year after opening its doors in Chicago, the 11-lawyer boutique firm is spinning off a new legal technology advisory company.
The firm's new subsidiary Quointec LLC will leverage artificial intelligence (AI) technology to build tools that automate the completion of simple legal and compliance tasks. Where the products go from there is anybody's guess.
“We can own it and license it. We can build it and sell it. We can build it for somebody else,” said Actuate partner Martin Tully.
Tully was part of the drafting team behind the Sedona Principles, a set of e-discovery guidelines that while non-binding, are widely accepted by judges. His outlook on Quointec is really pretty simple. Somebody is going to pursue advancements in legal compliance. So why not at least try to get out in front of it?
Plans for a legal tech subsidiary have been in the works since the Actuate's earliest days. Tully sees it more as an essential component of their business model than an optional attachment.
“Clearly this is where things are going, and you either get on this train and steer it or you're going to get run over by it. And it may not be tomorrow or five years from now but long-term, I think this is where our entire profession needs to go,” said Tully.
But go where, exactly? The terrain that Quointec looks to occupy is wide and varied. Yes, many of the tools will be aimed at simplifying compliance issues having to do with records management or navigating the likes of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But how those solutions originate or are put to use is open to discussion.
Tully sees Quointec developing products to client specifications for use in-house or developing solutions for other law firms. There's even been some interest from groups dealing with compliance issues outside of the influence of the legal industry.
“We found that there are some industries that want to work with us to build a tool that will help them deal with compliance issues where more than one entity will participate in that project, because it's not a competitive issue. Compliance isn't competitive. Everyone's got to do it,” Tully said.
For Actuate it's not so much about diversifying the firm's business as it is about making sure that the business itself is still around in the years to come. Automating simple compliance procedures frees up essential personnel in the firm to devote more attention to cases requiring human insight.
“I think that [for] law firms to survive into the next generation they have to embrace and start doing stuff like this or they won't survive into the next generation,” Tully said.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250