New Kilpatrick Townsend Portal Helps Clients Check Patent Statuses, Deadlines On the Fly
The visual, color-coded approach of the patent web portal allows executives to 'get your arms around what you have very quickly,' even for those not heavily steeped in the nuances of patent law, a firm partner said.
January 25, 2019 at 11:00 AM
2 minute read
When a Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton client has a late-night or early morning urge to check the status of their patents, they won't have to call or email their attorney. On Tuesday, Kilpatrick Townsend launched its KT Extranet, a free-of-charge client-only web portal for clients to check patent prosecution status.
KT Extranet offers real-time access to a client's patent portfolio and the ability to independently monitor patent assets, export information into company reports, and see docket information regarding issued and pending patents, according to a Kilpatrick Townsend press release.
In addition, the extranet also has the ability to present “patent family trees,” a feature that the law firm called essential for their clients.
Kilpatrick Townsend partner Mark Mathison explained, “Our clients patent things as a family; they buy and cluster in multiple families. How [a patent family tree] is presented is your first application goes at the top and as you follow with subsequent patents, they branch off and form a tree.”
“We originally looked for a third-party vendor that would do the same,” Mathison added. But the firm didn't find a vendor that would present the data similar to how companies manage their patent intellectual property. So the firm tasked its lawyers and programmers with creating the extranet themselves.
The firm used the patent portal in-house for a few years before deciding clients would also benefit from it. What's more, there may be more client-facing technology offerings from the firm on the horizon.
“We are focusing our resources on what clients really want to see and giving them access to what we can and making the process as transparent as we can,” Mathison said.
Kilpatrick Townsend joins other Big Law firms in offering patent-specific software for their firm and clients. Last year, Perkins Coie turned to legal technology provider Elevate to develop a project manager platform to easily track patent prosecution status for lawyers and clients. Robins Kaplan has also created its own IP tools that reviews clients' patent portfolios and monitors patent fillings for possible infringing filling applications.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250