Relativity Announces Pricing, Subscription Changes Aimed at Promoting RelativityOne
The e-discovery giant hopes to offer flexibility to customers and selling partners with the introduction of five major changes to pricing and licensing models.
January 28, 2019 at 09:32 AM
3 minute read
A little more than two years ago, Relativity made waves with its introduction of the cloud-based RelativityOne solution. Now, the e-discovery giant is hoping to promote RelativityOne adoption even more and offer flexibility to customers and selling partners with the introduction of new pricing and licensing models.
The changes come in five buckets:
1. Lower/flattening prices for data: Relativity is lowering overall data fees for RelativityOne up to 50 percent, with video and rich media data in particular highlighted as being billed at 50 percent of normal data fees. Data used for early case assessment, or repositories where data is reused across multiple matters, will be charged at 33 percent of active data, while archived case data in cold storage will be charged at 25 percent, the company said. The aim is to flatten out prices; while there will be some volume-based discounting, in general pricing will be uniform, the company added.
2. RelativityOne users: Currently, Relativity users can use both on-premises and cloud products. As a new option though, the company is offering a subscription for RelativityOne only, offered at a discount, depending on volume, of up to 60 percent. Relativity did not say what percentage of users it expects to adopt the RelativityOne only model, but noted that RelativityOne data subscriptions grew 420 percent in the past year.
3. Bundling unlimited analytics with RelativityOne: With RelativityOne will now come with access to unlimited analytics including email threading and active learning at no added cost. Relativity told Legaltech News that this includes the entire analytics feature set currently available. It's an area where the company has invested heavily in recent years.
4. Consumption-based licensing model: Relativity currently operates with a three year pre-commit fixed subscription model, but the company is now rolling out the option to subscribe based on monthly usage instead. Users and data will be “evaluated each month,” the company says. These models come in the form of either one or three year subscriptions, with the three year subscription having a slight discount in pricing.
5. New provider licensing option: Alongside the professional license currently offered, Relativity is also offering what it calls a “provider” licensing option. Aimed at solutions providers and law firms focused on discovery services, the provider option comes with “the ability to offer RelativityOne tenants for managed services arrangements,” the company said, alongside the ability to join the RelativityOne partner program for marketing opportunities and certifications.
Altogether, it's a set of changes designed to promote RelativityOne for a company that has increasingly had the cloud as its main focus. As of the company's Relativity Fest in October, it boasted 29 direct RelativityOne customers, and the product represented 11 percent of its under-contract revenue.
“We're starting to see e-discovery follow the cloud trend that's occurred in so many other industries,” said Andrew Sieja, founder and CEO of Relativity, in a press release announcing the pricing changes. “Our customers are having a lot of success in RelativityOne—not just bringing efficiencies and better security to their operation, but in transforming their products and services. We're excited about making changes that will allow more of our customers to experience these benefits.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 2In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 3Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
- 4Disney Legal Chief Sees Pay Surge 36%
- 5Legaltech Rundown: Consilio Launches Legal Privilege Review Tool, Luminance Opens North American Offices, and More
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250