Thomson Reuters to Offer Judicial Analytics with Westlaw Edge Update
The new Precedent Analytics feature, which integrates into Westlaw Edge's Litigation Analytics, looks to empower attorneys with insight into a judge's approach to certain areas of law.
January 28, 2019 at 08:01 AM
2 minute read
As a “next evolution” of the Westlaw Edge research platform, Thomson Reuters announced today the addition of a “Precedent Analytics” feature, which fully integrates into platform's Litigation Analytics component. Jeff Arvidson, director of product management at Thomson Reuters, said the new feature will allow users to see and analyze “the cases and court judges rely on when they are drafting opinions.”
With Precedent Analytics, users can select a state or federal judge to see her or his past rulings in a specific area of law, then determine what cases and courts were most cited or referenced in those rulings. The feature also includes a heat map that visually displays the federal districts or circuits, or all 50 state courts that a particular judge often cites from.
Arvidson said Precedent Analytics aims to empower attorneys with insight into a judge's approach to certain areas of law.
In a press release announcing the feature, Mike Dahn, senior vice president of Westlaw Product Management, explained the feature's value, adding, “Understanding which cases judges cite to most often by topic can be incredibly important for brief writing and effective advocacy.”
The addition of Precedent Analytics comes less than a year after Thomson Reuters released Westlaw Edge in July 2018. Described as one of the biggest updates to Westlaw in recent years, the new platform includes enhanced search capabilities, litigation analytics, and the ability to flag invalid or questionable rulings and case law, among other changes.
With the release of “Precedent Analytics,” Thomson Reuters joins a growing number of companies offering judicial ruling analytics. LexisNexis, for instance, launched LexisNexis href=”https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2018/11/29/new-data-analytics-tool-knows-every-federal-judges-favorite-cases-397-14291/”>, a judicial rulings analytics tool, in November 2018, just a few months after its July 2016 launch of Lexis href=”https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2018/07/12/lexisnexis-launches-lexis-analytics-leveraging-collective-power-of-recent-acquisitions/”>Analytics. Both products were a direct result of the company's June 2017 href=”https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/sites/legaltechnews/2017/06/08/lexisnexis-legal-professional-acquires-research-company-ravel-law-2/”>acquisitionof research company Ravel Law.
In addition to legacy companies, startup Gavelytics, which launched in 2017 as a judicial analytics platform initially focused on California judges, is also looking empower attorneys with case ruling information. The company, which raised $3.2 million in March 2018 and has since expanded to cover Florida judges as well, recently partnered with remote court appearance provider CourtCall in a bid to expand to the small law firm market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 2What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 3Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 4US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
- 5White & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage Inc. in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250