Thomson Reuters to Offer Judicial Analytics with Westlaw Edge Update
The new Precedent Analytics feature, which integrates into Westlaw Edge's Litigation Analytics, looks to empower attorneys with insight into a judge's approach to certain areas of law.
January 28, 2019 at 08:01 AM
2 minute read
As a “next evolution” of the Westlaw Edge research platform, Thomson Reuters announced today the addition of a “Precedent Analytics” feature, which fully integrates into platform's Litigation Analytics component. Jeff Arvidson, director of product management at Thomson Reuters, said the new feature will allow users to see and analyze “the cases and court judges rely on when they are drafting opinions.”
With Precedent Analytics, users can select a state or federal judge to see her or his past rulings in a specific area of law, then determine what cases and courts were most cited or referenced in those rulings. The feature also includes a heat map that visually displays the federal districts or circuits, or all 50 state courts that a particular judge often cites from.
Arvidson said Precedent Analytics aims to empower attorneys with insight into a judge's approach to certain areas of law.
In a press release announcing the feature, Mike Dahn, senior vice president of Westlaw Product Management, explained the feature's value, adding, “Understanding which cases judges cite to most often by topic can be incredibly important for brief writing and effective advocacy.”
The addition of Precedent Analytics comes less than a year after Thomson Reuters released Westlaw Edge in July 2018. Described as one of the biggest updates to Westlaw in recent years, the new platform includes enhanced search capabilities, litigation analytics, and the ability to flag invalid or questionable rulings and case law, among other changes.
With the release of “Precedent Analytics,” Thomson Reuters joins a growing number of companies offering judicial ruling analytics. LexisNexis, for instance, launched LexisNexis href=”https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2018/11/29/new-data-analytics-tool-knows-every-federal-judges-favorite-cases-397-14291/”>, a judicial rulings analytics tool, in November 2018, just a few months after its July 2016 launch of Lexis href=”https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2018/07/12/lexisnexis-launches-lexis-analytics-leveraging-collective-power-of-recent-acquisitions/”>Analytics. Both products were a direct result of the company's June 2017 href=”https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/sites/legaltechnews/2017/06/08/lexisnexis-legal-professional-acquires-research-company-ravel-law-2/”>acquisitionof research company Ravel Law.
In addition to legacy companies, startup Gavelytics, which launched in 2017 as a judicial analytics platform initially focused on California judges, is also looking empower attorneys with case ruling information. The company, which raised $3.2 million in March 2018 and has since expanded to cover Florida judges as well, recently partnered with remote court appearance provider CourtCall in a bid to expand to the small law firm market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250