Deconstructing Contracts: A Look at Universal Data Models
"The Golden Age of Contractual Insight and Innovation is Near: But First, You Need a Universal Data Model" panel at Legalweek explored some of the challenges lawyers face with regard to maintaining their contract databases.
January 30, 2019 at 10:13 AM
3 minute read
Reading may be fundamental, but it certainly isn't cost-efficient. That was the upshot of Legalweek 2019′s "The Golden Age of Contractual Insight and Innovation is Near: But First, You Need a Universal Data Model" panel on Tuesday.
Moderated by Jamie Wodetzki, chief product officer and co-founder of Exari, the panel explored the challenges lawyers face in trying to quickly review or retrieve key pieces of data from existing contracts. Joining Wodetzki were Oliver Round, counsel and vice president of BNY Mellon, and Michael Willis, director of forensic technology solutions at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
The first half of the panel focused on how some of the traditional methods of reviewing contracts—i.e., keyword searches or reading—are both time-consuming and nonconducive to times of regulatory change.
Willis used Brexit as an example of a development that is forcing clients to reevaluate and in some cases update contracts en mass as they prepare for the possible legal or regulatory changes that could accompany the United Kingdom's withdraw from the European Union.
"It's just a huge, huge headache," Willis said.
Round argued that "good" is a temporal condition, at least when it applies to contracts. Sooner or later regulations will change—think along the lines of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation—or a client will wake up in the middle of the night with a burning question about a clause buried deep into the body of the document.
"All these issues that you're pointing out, they're also magnified by volume," Round said.
While businesses tend to be interested in commercial and operational contract data, lawyers are drawn to clauses associated with risk. But finding all of the needles in the haystack and putting them in the correct order may just be a matter of putting the right data in the right places.
The panelists argued in favor of utilizing contracts based on a universal data models, which establish how different pieces of information are connected to one another as well as processed and stored within a system.
In the body of a contract, the various data points might be organized in terms of the parties involved or the terms of the arrangement. Utilizing a model could make it easier to compare different contracts or perform overall maintenance.
According to Willis, universal contract models create efficiency and robustness. But the panel also noted that there are some of potential downsides to such models as well, including upfront effort involved and the general unfamiliarity associated with any new system.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250