Despite Its Help, Some Lawyers Oppose Leveraging Tech for Access to Justice
Some lawyers are apprehensive of technology stealing potential clients for noncomplex litigation, according to a Legalweek panel.
January 31, 2019 at 11:57 AM
3 minute read
Speakers on the "Access to Justice: Substantial Challenges and How You, the Law and Technology Can Help" Legalweek panel questioned if the Rule of Professional Conduct banning unauthorized practice of law was harming access to justice in the U.S.
"The rules about the unauthorized practice of law is intended to protect consumers," said James Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corp. "In the interest of protecting consumers we've consigned too many to no help at all. The need of a lawyer can be a barrier of justice if you can't afford one."
Maura Grossman, a University of Waterloo professor in Ontario, Canada, said the measure may be self-serving. "People say it's to protect the people but I'm not convinced it's more to protect the lawyers than the public," she said.
Sandman called a recently formed task force in California, set to study if the unauthorized practice of law prohibition affects access to justice, "revolutionary."
As lawyers nationwide toil with that ethical question, legal technology is being accessed by low-income individuals across the nation.
Kiosks in U.S. courthouses are providing access to basic information regarding common legal issues for low-income people, Sandman said. Still, such innovations have received blowback from attorneys.
"They see these efforts as antagonistic," said U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez of the Western District of Texas.
Rodriguez said he tells worried attorneys "this is not an additional effort to exterminate you from practice."
He noted that courtroom kiosks and similar tools allow attorneys to focus on more complex legal matters.
Sandman, a former Arnold & Porter partner, said attorneys aren't losing customers because of such legal tech geared toward the access to justice.
"There's no lost job business opportunity. I think the real concern is that these tools will be of assistance to people who can afford attorneys. … I think the real concern might not be with low-income people but people of moderate incomes where they might be on the line of self-help and being able to afford an attorney."
To be sure, not all legal matters can be solved with legal technology, as some litigation requires human decisions, Grossman added. But technology still does provide a lot of help to some.
"I do think technology won't help with all of it, but for people who have nothing and no service, to go online and use some technology to assess where they have a claim; or what the law is in a particular place; or have a decision tree that will walk them through the various steps," it will help, Grossman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250