Despite Its Help, Some Lawyers Oppose Leveraging Tech for Access to Justice
Some lawyers are apprehensive of technology stealing potential clients for noncomplex litigation, according to a Legalweek panel.
January 31, 2019 at 11:57 AM
3 minute read
Speakers on the "Access to Justice: Substantial Challenges and How You, the Law and Technology Can Help" Legalweek panel questioned if the Rule of Professional Conduct banning unauthorized practice of law was harming access to justice in the U.S.
"The rules about the unauthorized practice of law is intended to protect consumers," said James Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corp. "In the interest of protecting consumers we've consigned too many to no help at all. The need of a lawyer can be a barrier of justice if you can't afford one."
Maura Grossman, a University of Waterloo professor in Ontario, Canada, said the measure may be self-serving. "People say it's to protect the people but I'm not convinced it's more to protect the lawyers than the public," she said.
Sandman called a recently formed task force in California, set to study if the unauthorized practice of law prohibition affects access to justice, "revolutionary."
As lawyers nationwide toil with that ethical question, legal technology is being accessed by low-income individuals across the nation.
Kiosks in U.S. courthouses are providing access to basic information regarding common legal issues for low-income people, Sandman said. Still, such innovations have received blowback from attorneys.
"They see these efforts as antagonistic," said U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez of the Western District of Texas.
Rodriguez said he tells worried attorneys "this is not an additional effort to exterminate you from practice."
He noted that courtroom kiosks and similar tools allow attorneys to focus on more complex legal matters.
Sandman, a former Arnold & Porter partner, said attorneys aren't losing customers because of such legal tech geared toward the access to justice.
"There's no lost job business opportunity. I think the real concern is that these tools will be of assistance to people who can afford attorneys. … I think the real concern might not be with low-income people but people of moderate incomes where they might be on the line of self-help and being able to afford an attorney."
To be sure, not all legal matters can be solved with legal technology, as some litigation requires human decisions, Grossman added. But technology still does provide a lot of help to some.
"I do think technology won't help with all of it, but for people who have nothing and no service, to go online and use some technology to assess where they have a claim; or what the law is in a particular place; or have a decision tree that will walk them through the various steps," it will help, Grossman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 2Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 3Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
- 4Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part
- 5'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250