Mobile Devices Become Important Resource as Texts, Chats Replace Emails
The "What's in Your Smartphone" panel at Legalweek dove into the many ways that smartphones can be used to shed light on an investigation. Sometimes what's not on a device is as important as what is.
January 31, 2019 at 10:21 AM
3 minute read
Attendees of the "What's in Your Smartphone" panel at Legalweek 2019 walked away with a handy nugget of legal advice for their troubles.
"If you're going to commit a crime, maybe it's best to leave your phone at home," said panelist Anna Clark, a partner at Phillips Lytle.
The rest of session tended to bear her out on that one, devoting an hour to the many, many, many different ways that cellphone data can be used during the course of an investigation to help shed light on a criminal or legal matter.
Warren Singh, supervisor of practice technology consulting at Latham & Watkins, used the example of a man who was harassing an ex-girlfriend. Geotagged selfies inside his phone helped to establish he had been in her vicinity.
"Understanding how clients are using these devices has really caused us to pause in how we approach cellphone data," Singh said.
But getting that data is not without it's hurdles. Employees who use personal phones at work, for example, may resist attempts by employers to retrieve data during the course of an investigation. Clark said that courts are generally requiring that this information be turned over.
Brian Morrison, principal e-discovery analyst at Liberty Mutual, perhaps has a clearer path forward than employers who are trying to obtain information from an employee's personal mobile device. He's typically dealing with phones that are COPE (corporate-owned, personally enabled).
"One of the big issues is how do you get the phone? Well, it's our phone, so hand it over," Morrison said.
Once the phone comes into their possession the investigation becomes about tracking patterns in the data. What is the first/last call the person makes every day? How do they label their contacts? A derogatory name, for example, could add context to a communication.
Patterns are also useful for identifying code words hidden inside messages.
"When people start saying 'Merry Christmas' and it's August that throws up some flags," Morrison said.
Laura Roman, a panelist and litigation operations and e-discovery specialist with the New York Stock Exchange, pointed out how data that is conspicuously absent from a mobile device can help paint a picture, too. In the case of financial transaction, for instance, a lack of data pertaining to Venmo, a mobile payment service, could be considered an oddity.
According to Roman, stock exchange investigations had previously revolved around trading data. Only in the last year have they started looking more closely at information and messages collected from mobile devices.
"We're starting to pay closer and closer communications to those communications instead of email," Roman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 2Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 3Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 4Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 5Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250