Tips From Big Law to Get Lawyers to Use Technology
Lawyers aren't known for being tech savvy, but that doesn't mean they won't use new software—so long as it is properly presented to them.
February 01, 2019 at 11:39 AM
3 minute read
As with any product, you should know who your target demographic is, and legal technology is no different. Directors of research at several large firms offered their insights and past experiences deploying technology at the “From Conversation to Conversion: Tips to Get Lawyers to Use New Tech” Legalweek session.
June Liebert, Sidley Austin's firmwide director of its library and research services, explained that choosing valuable software should be based on what a lawyer's practice needs are. For software to be deemed beneficial, it must help them address a client's matter.
For Cynthia Brown of Littler Mendelson, the first step with any new solution is testing its ability. After that, it's on to promoting and attracting lawyer engagement with the new product. Panelists agreed that promotion of the product should emphasize how it will improve a lawyer's day to day work.
“Basically we are taking the approach when we promote products that the idea is not to promote the product but what is going to make their lives more easier, make them more efficient, help them support their clients more effectively,” said Cheryl Smith, O'Melveny & Myers' director of information services.
Obtaining a firm leader to champion the product early on is also valuable promotion, the panel added.
After a technology is deployed, data analytics can offer useful insight regarding its usage and provide evidence for its continued support and information on who its key users are, added Jean O'Grady of DLA Piper.
“It's so critical to be able to understand what lawyers are using and who are the bigger users. When a vendor is discontinuing a product or the law firm decides to no longer purchase the product, knowing beforehand which lawyers are using what products is important,” she said.
To be sure, technology adoption rates can vary, and they may take some time to grow. “The adoption is not going to be immediate, it's OK if there's a curve,” O'Grady said. “It is OK for lawyers to come to you and ask you to 'use it for me now, and I'll learn it later.'”
For example, a boot camp training at DLA Piper teaching associates how to use analytic programs to help with their cases was an “adoption by proxy,” O'Grady said.
“It raised the general awareness that analytics are available and [allowed] lawyers [to] ask new questions,” O'Grady said. She added DLA Piper saw consistently higher usage of analytic programs after the boot camp.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 2Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 3Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 4Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
- 5Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250