How Law Firms Can Create a Valued, Client-Centric Approach
Valued information delivered quickly and succinctly is key to client-centric knowledge management, according to a Legalweek panel.
February 04, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
If law firms want to take a client-centric approach to their knowledge management, throwing technology at it isn't the first answer. Instead, the firm needs to know what information is important to their clients and deliver it as quickly and comprehensively as possible, according to a panel at Legalweek.
The panel, which was titled “Joining Forces—Create Client-Centric Knowledge Management” and took place during the final day of Legalweek, noted that in order to build a successful knowledge management system law firms need to understand their clients' needs and industry.
“Don't assume it's all about technology. It's more about conversation,” said Scott Bailey, global director of research services at Squire Patton Boggs.
Steven Lastres, director of Debevoise & Plimpton's knowledge management services, agreed that conversation is key and noted that technology can be used to clearly map out the existing relationships entities and attorneys have. That tool can easily allow a law firm to see who is best positioned to pitch potential business.
He added that knowledge management systems are key for quickly serving client needs. “Clients are smart consumers of legal services and they want to pay for your expertise and know-how. They don't want you to reinvent the wheel every time they come to you with a legal problem. One of the things we need to be doing as a law firm is responding quicker to what the client is asking for, and knowledge management inside law firms helps us do that.”
Lastres noted law firms can also benefit from knowledge management because it forces them to continually organize their clients' data.
“It also enables us to be more efficient, having all the information pertaining to a client in one place,” he said. “You can't share information about the client and the work product you do for the client unless you are organized. Part of knowledge management is creating systems and processes by which this information gets organized.”
As law firms invest in data-tracking platforms, in-house is also turning to knowledge management technology to carefully track outside counsel metrics, including their billing rates, services and diversity, Lastres added.
Likewise, as law firms may face stiffer vetting from general counsel and a possible recession, commoditizing their knowledge management systems can become a revenue option.
Sukesh Kamra of Norton Rose Fulbright said his firm created legal tech solutions to present information for clients' regulatory-specific questions. The solutions also provide Norton Rose lawyers contact information, if the user has follow-up questions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250