Microsoft Helps Develop an AI-Powered Bridge to Legal Aid
Microsoft has completed work on the artificial intelligence powering the Legal Navigator, which could change the way that people with limited resources gain access to legal aid.
February 06, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
A new legal aid tool developed with the help of Microsoft officially has a brain. According to an entry posted to the company's blog last Thursday, work on the artificial intelligence powering the aptly named Legal Navigator has been completed.
The tool, which is in the process of being rolled out, was developed in partnership with the Legal Services Corporation, Pro Bono Net, Pew Charitable Trusts and Avanade to help plug a gap between people with limited resources and the know-how needed to navigate basic legal proceedings. Legal Navigator can't offer advice—that's still the exclusive domain of human attorneys—but it will be able to walk a user step-by-step through the red tape of executing, say, a divorce.
“All those types of things are very helpful to someone who can't afford a lawyer because they don't know where to start,” said Dave Heiner, strategic policy advisor at Microsoft.
The tool was originally conceived with more of a hard-coded linear approach in mind. In other words, Question A would automatically trigger a response containing Answer B. But advances such as natural language processing convinced Microsoft that an AI-based approach was the way to go. Users will have the option of browsing the system by clicking on topics like “Family Law” or engaging with a chatbot-inspired interface.
“The goal is to enable people to interact with the system in a natural way, so not just keywords but typing in a query and having the system understand the meaning about the query,” Heiner said.
Even if a machine is fluent in Legalese, the average person tends not to throw around words like “briefs” or “protective order.” The Navigator has to be able to intuit the true meaning behind a request even if it isn't search engine-friendly.
So the Legal Navigator team worked with lawyers, law students, and court systems to evaluate real legal aid questions and link them to the appropriate responses. For example, if a user says “I'm afraid that my boyfriend is going to hurt me and my children,” the machine would ideally generate instructions for obtaining a protective order without the phrase “protective order” ever having to be uttered (or typed).
“The idea is [the users] don't even have to know that they have a legal problem,” said Glenn Rawdon, program counsel for technology at the Legal Services Corporation.
Early versions of the Navigator will focus exclusively on family law, housing and consumer issues. According to Rawdon, those three areas comprise about 90 percent of what brings people through the doors of a legal aid center.
Hawaii and Alaska will serve as the pilot states for the tool's launch. Mark O'Brien, executive director of Pro Bono Net, said those two jurisdictions were chosen in part because they recognized how a system like Legal Navigator could raise broader legal awareness.
“They were both jurisdictions that when they put together their proposal had really thought hard about not just the delivery of legal information and services, but find-ability and how legal problems relate to other life problems that people are having or challenges,” O'Brien said.
An official launch date has yet to be determined, but Rawdon is guessing that it will occur later this year.
“The idea is for us to run this for a couple of years until we can get Hawaii and Alaska going, maybe onboard a few more states and then figure out where the permanent home of Legal Navigator would be,” Rawdon said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Who Should Pay? Insurer Wants No Part of $30M Sexual Abuse Settlement
- 2Passenger Sues Frontier Airlines for Burns Sustained From In-Flight Beverage
- 3Who Are Trump's Potential Candidates for Attorney General?
- 4Drugmaker Wins $70.5M After Fed Judge Says Generic Sales Were Blocked
- 5Out of Thin Scienter: Protecting Confidential Information in Light of ‘NVIDIA v. Ohman’
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250