Alston & Bird Partners With Georgia State University on Legal Analytics
'I don't think we just want to limit ourselves to waiting for the market to try and deliver to us. We want to think more about it,' said Alston & Bird senior director of legal technology innovation Nola Vanhoy.
February 08, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
Alston & Bird is headed back to school. The Atlanta-based firm is partnering with the Legal Analytics Lab at Georgia State University to receive some hands-on tutoring in data analytics and related tools such as machine learning and text mining. In return, the firm's attorneys will guest-lecture in graduate-level classes and participate in analytics programs on campus.
Beyond the mutual educational value, the partnership grants Alston some independence from the whims of the legal tech marketplace, where attorneys can sometimes be at the mercy of vendors. As law schools dive deeper into the technology sphere, a symbiotic relationship with firms could combine the practical experience and scientific exploration needed to refine the next generation of legal technology.
While Alston won't be turning its back on third-party analytics products any time soon, the firm's senior director of legal technology innovation Nola Vanhoy said they are looking to dive a bit deeper with their approach to tech.
“I don't think we just want to limit ourselves to waiting for the market to try and deliver to us. We want to think more about it,” Vanhoy said.
Alston had a preexisting relationship with GSU that included internships with students who had a strong background in analytics. Fresh blood—even temporary fresh blood—helped keep the firm abreast of technological developments and other potential advances worth watching.
Vanhoy said the presence of those people kept Alston fresh. Without an influx of new ideas or concepts, it's easy for a business to fall into a rut.
“People who work together all start using the same kinds of tools together and we do things a standard way. Every business does,” Vanhoy said.
Fortunately there doesn't appear to be a shortage of tech-savvy law students approaching any time soon. In December, Legaltech News reported on first legal analytics course held at the University of Kansas School of Law, where students got to try their hand at solving complex problems with data analysis and artificial intelligence tools. A similar effort involving AI and text mining was undertaken at Columbia University last fall with the legal tech startup Evisort.
As for GSU, the school's Legal Analytics Lab is a collaboration between the university's College of Law and Institute for Insight, a data analytics unit based out of the J. Mack Robinson College of Business.
Per Charlotte Alexander, an associate professor of legal studies in the Department of Risk Management and Insurance, the institute routinely does what it calls “sprints,” which are really just opportunities for faculty and students to work with outside corporations or law firms on real-life problems. Finding a willing partner has never been an issue.
Alexander thinks that because law schools exist separately from some of the day-to-day business demands that drive law firms or tech vendors, they can focus on “bench science,” a.k.a. the scientific research experimentation that's being used to generate new insights into legal tech.
“A university doesn't have the pressure of bringing a tool to market like a startup might, and so we're able to really experiment at the cutting edge of what analytics might be able to do in analyzing judges' opinions, for example. We're able to push the limits and really serve as a laboratory,” Alexander said.
On the flip side, relationships with a law firm can provide university-based researchers with a working knowledge of how analytics are being applied practically by lawyers and their clients. Vahnoy said Alston has previously looped the institute in on cases involving clients who are interested in leveraging analytics to better understand their own business practices or litigation history.
As for the firm itself, the training from GSU could help attorneys gain a better handle on everything from variables that could impact trial outcomes to how many people are actually opening their client advisory emails.
Vanhoy expects to see more team-ups between firms and law schools in the future.
“I think other law firms will catch on. They'll go, 'Wait, why aren't we doing something like this?'” Vanhoy said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250