Becoming the Killer Whale: Changing Mindsets Key to Law Firm Innovation
Thinking about innovation differently was the focus behind the New Legal Service Delivery portion of the second Association of Legal Technologists (ALT) conference.
February 11, 2019 at 10:15 AM
4 minute read
The opening of the Association of Legal Technologists' second ctrl ALT del conference opened with a call to arms for attorneys to start thinking about technology. But the mission wasn't that lawyers should drop everything and start changing their workflows—instead, the call was to think differently about the possibilities in the marketplace.
“In most environments in a law firm, it's very difficult to have the lawyers engage with others and actually listen,” said Michael Kraft, founder and general counsel of Kraft Kennedy. “I try to encourage the law firms that we talk with to pull together the various heads of departments. To me, it's always been like Upstairs, Downstairs … [attorneys] think they know what they're doing, but they don't have a clue.”
This shift in mindset was the focus behind the New Legal Service Delivery portion of ALT's programming. ReplyAll Corp. CEO and legal technology writer and speaker Zach Abramowitz began the conference by exploring technologies that have been developed within law firms. He likened law firms to killer whales—just as killer whales have learned to “beach” themselves to catch unsuspecting seals as prey, so too can law firms change their strategies when necessary to capture markets some thought they'd never reach.
He explained the concept through his own work consulting with Reed Smith. In 2014, the firm had developed an internal solution called Periscope that helped attorneys analyze their data and recommended, implemented and optimized legal technology systems. But they thought differently and could do more—Reed Smith started a wholly owned subsidiary called GravityStack in 2018 to sell the solution to the market, and just last month even brought another law firm on board as a client.
But very few law firms are at this point yet, and how to take the next step is a matter of debate.
On a panel following Abramowitz's talk, Joe Borstein, global director at Pangea3 Legal Managed Services and director of innovation with Thomson Reuters, noted that a natural first step for many legal organizations is not going straight to technology, but rather examining their own processes.
“We often talk at conferences about artificial intelligence and other types of innovation, but business structure innovation has been just as important, if not more important, legally,” he explained, adding that in a recent Thomson Reuters survey alternative legal service providers (ALSPs) commanded $10 billion of the global legal market.
The entrance of these alternative providers has naturally led many firms to innovate to compete. Martin Catania, director of client relationship management at Keno Kozie Associates, noted that he has seen a rise in CIOs and other technologists coming from outside the legal market to firms to drive new ideas.
“I assume that you're going to continue to see that, just like we're seeing in all industries,” Catania added.
Still, especially when talking with attorneys, there's not a guarantee that these voices will always be heard. Joseph Scott, chief strategy officer at American LegalNet, said that “there's something about the lawyers' DNA that they think they can take on new things and do them better than everyone ever did them.” Rather than taking that mindset, he advised, “Bring in somebody who has had some of those [different] experiences and understands the business side of things. It is different from practicing law.”
He added that he tells his kids, “We all learn from experience, but it doesn't have to be your own experience.”
Indeed, to start to think differently, the general takeaway from the beginning of ALT was that it all starts with communication. For his part, Kraft said that the main way to success for attorneys is to approach businesspeople with a new mindset, quoting Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's Joe Flom in saying, “Don't tell them what they can't do; find them a legal route to do what they want.”
Otherwise, attorneys may end up the seal who didn't realize change was afoot rather than their destiny as a killer whale.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250