Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence Could Spur Conversation in Legal Profession
The order signed by President Donald Trump on Monday, known as the American AI Initiative, will direct federal agencies to prioritize AI investments, set governance standards and help and build a workforce in the AI world.
February 13, 2019 at 11:05 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
President Donald Trump's signing of an executive order which encourages the use of artificial intelligence could signal technology becoming more prevalent in the legal industry, according to experts in the field.
The order signed by Trump on Monday, known as the American AI Initiative, will direct federal agencies to prioritize AI investments, set governance standards and help to build a workforce in the AI world.
Jeremy Elman, a partner at Dorsey & Whitney in Palo Alto, California, said with federal guidance on how AI can be used, law firms may be more likely to find ways to adopt the technology. In the past, attorneys at law firms have been hesitant to adopt that kind of technology, while legal departments at companies are more likely to do so.
“I think that certainly AI being more a part of the national conversation, and an increasing share of clients are going to be using it day to day, so I think naturally more law firms that will be integrated with their clients will be using it,” Elman explained. “It's going to be a more regular part of corporate life.”
He said the national conversation around having standards on the use of AI will also make law firms more comfortable with using the technology.
“I think law firms will suddenly get a lot more interested in using AI if there is going to be more regulatory oversight and more topics and if there is going to be an AI czar in the White House,” Elman said.
➤➤ Want to read more about how new tech is challenging old laws and changing the legal profession? Sign up for What's Next, a weekly email briefing on the future of law.
There has appeared to be a hesitancy in law firms utilizing AI. IBM Watson Legal co-founder Brian Kuhn told Corporate Counsel last month that, in his experience, legal departments are more likely to use AI technology than their firms are.
Ryan Blaney, a partner and chair of the privacy and data security group at Cozen O'Connor in Washington, D.C., said he doesn't look at the executive order as something directed toward private industry such as law firms, but he said it does start a conversation.
“In reviewing this executive order, I think it's more geared toward government and the agencies. President Trump is really directing his agencies and to do research around AI and to implement budgetary line items associated with the research and development of AI,” Blaney said.
Blaney, however, said he sees the order as a way to start a conversation on perfecting the technology.
“Law firms are making investments in AI and other technology to better serve our clients,” Blaney said.
He compared the use of AI in the legal profession to that in health care, saying right now AI is mainly used as an assistant rather than taking over a job.
“The same would be true for a law firm. Right now, AI is really being used as a means of assisting a lawyer to be able to provide legal advice,” Blaney said. “I think there is tremendous risk in having it be a stand-alone piece of advice.”
Blaney said he believes the executive order will spur collaboration.
“One of the good things about the executive order is that it seems to be an innovation for collaboration between the private and public sector and I think that's always the best type of guidance that can be provided,” Blaney said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250