Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence Could Spur Conversation in Legal Profession
The order signed by President Donald Trump on Monday, known as the American AI Initiative, will direct federal agencies to prioritize AI investments, set governance standards and help and build a workforce in the AI world.
February 13, 2019 at 11:05 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
President Donald Trump's signing of an executive order which encourages the use of artificial intelligence could signal technology becoming more prevalent in the legal industry, according to experts in the field.
The order signed by Trump on Monday, known as the American AI Initiative, will direct federal agencies to prioritize AI investments, set governance standards and help to build a workforce in the AI world.
Jeremy Elman, a partner at Dorsey & Whitney in Palo Alto, California, said with federal guidance on how AI can be used, law firms may be more likely to find ways to adopt the technology. In the past, attorneys at law firms have been hesitant to adopt that kind of technology, while legal departments at companies are more likely to do so.
“I think that certainly AI being more a part of the national conversation, and an increasing share of clients are going to be using it day to day, so I think naturally more law firms that will be integrated with their clients will be using it,” Elman explained. “It's going to be a more regular part of corporate life.”
He said the national conversation around having standards on the use of AI will also make law firms more comfortable with using the technology.
“I think law firms will suddenly get a lot more interested in using AI if there is going to be more regulatory oversight and more topics and if there is going to be an AI czar in the White House,” Elman said.
|
➤➤ Want to read more about how new tech is challenging old laws and changing the legal profession? Sign up for What's Next, a weekly email briefing on the future of law.
There has appeared to be a hesitancy in law firms utilizing AI. IBM Watson Legal co-founder Brian Kuhn told Corporate Counsel last month that, in his experience, legal departments are more likely to use AI technology than their firms are.
Ryan Blaney, a partner and chair of the privacy and data security group at Cozen O'Connor in Washington, D.C., said he doesn't look at the executive order as something directed toward private industry such as law firms, but he said it does start a conversation.
“In reviewing this executive order, I think it's more geared toward government and the agencies. President Trump is really directing his agencies and to do research around AI and to implement budgetary line items associated with the research and development of AI,” Blaney said.
Blaney, however, said he sees the order as a way to start a conversation on perfecting the technology.
“Law firms are making investments in AI and other technology to better serve our clients,” Blaney said.
He compared the use of AI in the legal profession to that in health care, saying right now AI is mainly used as an assistant rather than taking over a job.
“The same would be true for a law firm. Right now, AI is really being used as a means of assisting a lawyer to be able to provide legal advice,” Blaney said. “I think there is tremendous risk in having it be a stand-alone piece of advice.”
Blaney said he believes the executive order will spur collaboration.
“One of the good things about the executive order is that it seems to be an innovation for collaboration between the private and public sector and I think that's always the best type of guidance that can be provided,” Blaney said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250