Companies Shifting Data Breach Focus From Risk Management to Response Tools
Respondents said risk and compliance automation tools are the most effective at securing their organization from cyber threats. However, many said breach response and forensics tools could offer additional cybersecurity effectiveness in the coming years.
February 19, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Canadian companies currently see risk and compliance automation tools as an effective way to protect their data, but respondents to a recent survey say their interest may shift as Canadian and international regulations place a greater emphasis on data breach responses.
“The Cyber Resilience of Canadian Organizations” survey collected the responses of 407 Canadian companies from September 2018 to October 2018. The survey was conducted by information technology analysts International Data Corporation Canada and Scalar, an IT solutions provider.
Risk and compliance automation tools were deemed the most important security tool by 17 percent of respondents, according to the report. Slightly fewer companies (14 percent) expect to consider risk and compliance automation tools to improve the effectiveness of their company in three years.
Almost half (46 percent) of respondents said they were most interested in adding breach response and forensics tools in three years, while only 13 percent said it's an effective cybersecurity tool used in 2018.
That growing concern with breach response and forensics tools seems warranted, as many respondents reported their company must comply with various Canadian and international data protection laws, some of which can dish out hefty monetary penalties.
Indeed, 71 percent of respondents said their companies must comply with Canada's Digital Privacy Act and Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). The PIPEDA includes recording any breach and requiring organizations that face a breach of “real risk of significant harm to individuals” to notify affected individuals and Canada's privacy commissioner, which went into effect Nov. 1.
The General Data Protection Regulation was also selected by 64 percent of respondents as a law their company must comply with. The GDPR includes a mandatory notification when a data breach is likely to “result in a risk for the rights and freedoms of individuals” 72 hours after a company is made aware of the breach. The data privacy regulation also includes new requirements of organizations to “implement appropriate technical and organizational measures … in order to meet the requirements of this regulation and protect the rights of data subjects” and other key measures that could result in a minimal penalty of 2 percent of their annual revenue.
The survey also found more companies are moving to the cloud, with 62 percent using the cloud and on-premise software. However, only 7 percent update their public cloud software immediately when a patch is available. Meanwhile, 23 percent of respondents said they updated on-premise software updates as soon as a patch is released.
The survey noted organizations are likely placing data stored on the cloud at risk when they wait to install an update, although 51 percent of respondents said they installed updates to cloud software within a week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250